Técnicas projetivas: em busca de uma alternativa para validade e confiabilidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v23i3.25536Palavras-chave:
técnica projetiva, abordagem qualitativa, confiabilidade, validadeResumo
Objetivo: Este ensaio visa discutir o rigor da técnica projetiva com um foco qualitativo.
Resultados: As principais críticas às técnicas projetivas não são apropriadas para pesquisa qualitativa. Como alternativa estabeleceu-se os critérios propostos por Lincoln e Guba (1985). São elas credibilidade, transferibilidade, dependabilidade e confirmabilidade.
Contribuições Teóricas/Metodológicas: O ensaio demonstra a contribuição metodológica. Também ilustra como a técnica projetiva pode ser aplicada para construir seu rigor através de uma lente qualitativa.
Downloads
Referências
Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Brekelmans, M., and Oost, H. (2008). Auditing quality of research in social sciences. Quality and Quantity, 42, 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9044-4
Antunes, L., Castro, C., and Mineiro, A. (2021). Network orchestration: the new role of business incubators? Innovation and Management Review, 18(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2019-0151
Antunes, L., Vasconcelos, F., Oliveira, C., and Corrêa, H. (2022). Dynamic framework of performance assessment for startups. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(7), 2723-2742. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2020-0382
Boddy, C. (2005). Projective techniques in market research: valueless subjectivity or insightful reality. International Journal of Market Research, 47 (3), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530504700304
Borelli, F., Hemais, M. and Dias, P. (2012). Ecológicos ou Controlados? Construindo Discursivamente o Consumidor Consciente. ReMark - Revista Brasileira De Marketing, 11(2), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v11i2.2294
Brunod, R. (1999). Les bases théoriques de la sémiologie en pédopsychiatrie. Archives de Pédiatrie, 6 (3), p. 440-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-693X(99)80228-0
Campos, A., Nascimento, T., Oliveira, F., Vilas Boas, L. and Rezende, D. (2020). “Before alone or (well) accompanied”? The Use of Projective Marketing Techniques. The Qualitative Report, 25(2), 471-486.
Cho, J. and Trent, A. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative Research, 6 (3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065006
Cypress, B. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36 (4), p. 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253
Denzin, N. (1977). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (2011). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Doherty, S. and Nelson, R. (2010). Using projective techniques to tap into consumers' feelings, perceptions and attitudes... getting an honest opinion. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34 (4), p. 400-404, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00880.x
Donmoyer, R. (1999). Paradigm talk (and its absence) in the second edition of The Handbook of Research on Educational Administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35 (4), p. 614-641, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131619921968653
Donoghue, S. (2000). Projective techniques in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 28 (1), 2000.
Durkheim, E. (2023). The rules of sociological method. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 9-14). Routledge.
Faria, M. and Carvalho, J. (2017). A Proficuidade das Técnicas Projetivas na Pesquisa do Comportamento do Consumidor com Deficiência Intelectual. In: Encontro Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Administração, São Paulo: SP, Brasil.
Ferreira, A, Zanola, F., Antunes, L. and Vilas Boas, L. (2017). Apontamentos para Uso de Técnica Projetiva em Pesquisas de Marketing. Revista de Administração Unimep, 17 (3), p. 10-90.
Godoy, A.(2005). Refletindo sobre critérios de qualidade da pesquisa qualitativa. GESTÃO. Org-Revista Eletrônica de Gestão Organizacional, 3 (2).
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8 (4) p. 597-606.
González-Salgado, I., Rivera-Navarro, J., Gutiérrez-Sastre, M., Conde, P., and Franco, M. (2024). Conducting member checking within a qualitative case study on health-related behaviours in a large European city: Appraising interpretations and co-constructing findings. Health, 28(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593221109682
Green, J. (1984). Approaching the core of consumer behaviour. Marketing Research, 14, p. 649-656, 1984.
Guba, E. (1981) Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29 (2), p. 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
Günther, H. (2006). Pesquisa qualitativa versus pesquisa quantitativa: esta é a questão. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 22 (2), p. 201-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722006000200010.
Hair Jr, J., Black, W., Barry J., Anderson, R., and Tatham, R. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora.
Haire, M. (1950). Projective techniques in marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 14, p. 649-656, 1950. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224295001400501
Hussey, M. and Duncombe, N. (1999). Projecting the right image: using projective techniques to measure brand image. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 2, p. 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522759910251918
Kassarjian, H. (1974). Projective methods. In Ferber, R. 1974. Handbook of marketing research. New York. McGraw-Hill.
Kerlinger, N. (1973). Foundation of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
Klofper, W. and Taulbee, E. (1976). Projective tests. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, p. 543-568. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.27.020176.002551
Kozinets, R., and Gretzel, U. (2024). Netnography evolved: New contexts, scope, procedures and sensibilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103693
Kvale, S. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1 (1), p. 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100103
Lilienfeld, S., Wood, J. and Garb, H. (2001). What’s wrong with this picture?. Scientific American, 284(5), 80-87.
Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1986 (30), p. 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage.
Macedo, R., Galeffi, D., and Pimentel, Á. (2009). Um rigor outro sobre a qualidade na pesquisa qualitativa: educação e ciências humanas [online]. Salvador: EDUFBA.
Maffezzolli, F., Ribeiro, C., Lima, T., Semprebom, E., Prado, P., and Mady, E. (2009). Reflexões sobre o uso de técnicas projetivas na condução de pesquisas qualitativas em marketing. PMKT–Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa de Marketing, Opinião e Mídia, 3, 37-48.
Mahoney, J., and Barrenechea, R. (2019). The logic of counterfactual analysis in case‐study explanation. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(1), 306-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12340
Malhotra, N. (2009). Pesquisa de marketing: uma orientação aplicada. Bookman Editora.
Martins, D. (2013). As Especificidades da concepção de “objetividade” em Max Weber. 2013. 96 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sociologia) – Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Programa de Pós Graduação em Sociologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió.
Mcgrath, M., Sherry, Jr., and Levy, S. (1993). Giving voice to the gift: the use of projective techniques to recover lost meanings. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2 (2), 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80023-X
Medeiros, M, Machado, D. and Passador, J.. (2017). Técnicas projetivas: aplicações, limitações e potenciais para o uso em pesquisas em turismo. Marketing and Tourism Review, 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.29149/mtr.v2i1.4298
Miguel, F. (2014). Mitos e verdades no ensino de técnicas projetivas. Psico-USF, 19 (1), p. 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712014000100010
Moreira, H. (2018). Critérios e estratégias para garantir o rigor na pesquisa qualitativa. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia, 11 (1), p.405-424. https://doi.org/10.3895/rbect.v11n1.6977
Nelson, C, Treichler, P. A and Grossberg, L. (1992). Cultural studies: An introduction. In: L. Grossberg, C. Nelson and P. A. Theichler (eds). Cultural Studies, 1(5).
Northcote, M. (2012). Selecting criteria to evaluate qualitative research. Education Papers and Journal Articles. 38. p.98-110.
Oliveira, S., and Piccinini, V. (2009). Validade e reflexividade na pesquisa qualitativa. Cadernos Ebape.Br, 7 (1), p. 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512009000100007
Ollaik, L., and Ziller, H. (2012). Concepções de validade em pesquisas qualitativas. Educação e Pesquisa, 38 (1), p. 229-241.
Ott, T., and Eisenhardt, K. (2020). Decision weaving: Forming novel, complex strategy in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Management Journal, 41(12), 2275-2314. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3189
Porr, C., Mayan, M., Graffigna, G., Wall, S., and Vieira, E. (2011). The evocative power of projective techniques for the elicitation of meaning. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000103
Rojas-Rivas, E., Espinoza-Ortega, A., Thomé-Ortiz, H., and Cuffia, F. (2022). More than words! A narrative review of the use of the projective technique of word association in the studies of food consumer behavior: Methodological and theoretical implications. Food Research International, 156, 111124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111124.
Scheurenbrand, K., Parsons, E., Cappellini, B., and Patterson, A. (2018). Cycling into headwinds: Analyzing practices that inhibit sustainability. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 37(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810440
Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22 (2), p. 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Spry, L., and Pich, C. (2021). Enhancing data collection methods with qualitative projective techniques in the exploration of a university’s brand identity and brand image. International Journal of Market Research, 63(2), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320943045
Stake. R. (2000). Case Studies. In: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.) Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage. p. 435-454.
Steinman, R. (2009). Projective techniques in consumer research. International Bulletin of Business Administration, 5 (1), p. 37-45.
Stenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision, 39 (7), p. 551-556. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005801
Ullrich, D., de Oliveira, J., Basso, K., and Visentini, M. (2012). Reflexões teóricas sobre confiabilidade e validade em pesquisas qualitativas: em direção à reflexividade analítica. Análise–Revista de Administração da PUCRS, 23(1), 19-30.
Valente, M. (2016). História dos testes psicológicos. Boletim de Psicologia, 66 (144), p. 125-129.
Veal, A. (2011). Metodologia de Pesquisa em Lazer e Turismo. São Paulo: Aleph.
Webb, J. (1992). Understanding and designing marketing research. London. Academic Press.
Will, V, Eadie, D and Macaskill, S. (1996). Projective and enabling techniques explored. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14, p. 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634509610131144
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Luiz Guilherme Rodrigues Antunes; Rafael de Freitas Souza, Ana Cristina Ferreira, Fernanda de Aguiar Zanola, Luiz Henrique de Barros Vilas Boas
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
