A utilização de inteligência artificial nos tribunais com objetivo de construção de uma jurisprudência virtuosa

Patrícia Borba Marchetto; Arthur Gonçales Cassiani

doi:10.5585/2024.26346

Autores/as

Patrícia Borba Marchetto Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) / Araraquara, SP – Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-961X
Arthur Gonçales Cassiani Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) / Ribeirão Preto, SP – Brasil https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3803-0640

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.26346

Palabras clave:

inteligência artificial nos tribunais, jurisprudência virtuosa com o uso de inteligência artificial, aprendizado de máquinas e decisões judiciais

Resumen

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Patrícia Borba Marchetto, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) / Araraquara, SP – Brasil

Arthur Gonçales Cassiani, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) / Ribeirão Preto, SP – Brasil

Citas

AMAYA, Amalia. Virtud y Razón en el Derecho: Hacia una Teoría Neo-Aristotélica de la Argumentación Jurídica (Virtue and Reason in Law). Revista Brasileira de Filosofia. 2012. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2064298. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2023.

AMAYA, Amalia. Virtuous Adjudication; or the Relevance of Judicial Character to Legal Interpretation. Statute Law Review, v. 40, Issue 1, February 2019, p. 87–95. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmy033. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2023.

ELIOT, Lance B. Robustness and Overcoming Brittleness of AI-Enabled Legal Micro-Directives: The Role of Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning. Computer Science – Computers and Society. Cornell University. 2020. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02243v1# . Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

ESPOSITO, Elena. Transparency Versus Explanation: The Role of Ambiguity in Legal AI”. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Research in Computational Law, v. 1, n. 2. 2021. Disponível em: https://journalcrcl.org/crcl/article/view/10. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2023.

FRANKLIN, James. Discussion paper: how much of commonsense and legal reasoning is formalizable? A review of conceptual obstacles. Law, Probability and Risk, [S.l.], v. 11, p. 225-245, 2012. Advance. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgs007. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2024.

GOWDER, P. Is legal cognition computational? (When will DeepVehicle replace Judge Hercules?). In: Whalen, Ryan (Ed.) Computational Legal Studies: The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Research. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2020. p. 215-237 Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977456.00015. Acesso em: 18 jun. 2023.

HOOFT, S. Van. Ética da virtude. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2006.

KNUTH, Donald E. The Art of Computer Programming, v. 2: Seminumerical Algorithms. Estados Unidos da América: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1969.

LIVERMORE, Michael A. Rule by Rules. Prepared for Computational Legal Studies: The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Legal Research. In: WHALEN, Ryan (ed.). Forthcoming 2019. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3387701. Acesso em: 2 jun. 2024.

MCCARTHY, John; DREYFUS, Hubert L. What Computers Still Can't Do: a critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: The MIT Press 1996.

MICHELON, Claudio. Practical Wisdom in Legal Decision-Making. University of Edinburgh School of Law Working, n. 2010/13, 2010. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1585929. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2023.

SOLUM, Lawrence B., Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centered Theory of Judging. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, v. 34, n. 1/2, jan. 2003. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.369940. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2023.

TACCA, Adriano; ROCHA, Leonel Severo. Inteligência artificial: reflexos no sistema do direito. NOMOS: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFC, Fortaleza, v.38, n.2, jul./dez., 2018, p.53-68

VANDERSTICHELE, Genevieve. Reasoning in court with the outcome of a machine learning algorithm with case law as an input. [s.l.]. 2020. Disponível em: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2632/MIREL-19_paper_2.pdf. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2023.