A utilização de inteligência artificial nos tribunais com objetivo de construção de uma jurisprudência virtuosa

Patrícia Borba Marchetto; Arthur Gonçales Cassiani

doi:10.5585/2024.26346

Authors

Patrícia Borba Marchetto Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) / Araraquara, SP – Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-961X
Arthur Gonçales Cassiani Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) / Ribeirão Preto, SP – Brasil https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3803-0640

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.26346

Keywords:

artificial intelligence in courts, virtuous jurisprudence through the use of artificial intelligence, machine learning and judicial decisions

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence in courts around the world has sparked the interest of jurists, aiming to determine the legal nature of algorithms and machine learning in order to confer a specific role to AI in the construction of virtuous jurisprudence. While some researchers believe that machines should contribute quantitatively, attempting to reduce the Judiciary's backlog, there are scholars who see technology as a qualitative alternative, resulting in greater legal certainty and uniformity of decisions. However, both alternatives carry their respective risks. Therefore, it is necessary to approach the issue to determine the role of artificial intelligence in Brazilian courts. Thus, through a methodology of bibliographic reference investigation, the nuances of using predictive technology and artificial intelligence in the Brazilian Judiciary will be analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Patrícia Borba Marchetto, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) / Araraquara, SP – Brasil

Arthur Gonçales Cassiani, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) / Ribeirão Preto, SP – Brasil

References

AMAYA, Amalia. Virtud y Razón en el Derecho: Hacia una Teoría Neo-Aristotélica de la Argumentación Jurídica (Virtue and Reason in Law). Revista Brasileira de Filosofia. 2012. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2064298. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2023.

AMAYA, Amalia. Virtuous Adjudication; or the Relevance of Judicial Character to Legal Interpretation. Statute Law Review, v. 40, Issue 1, February 2019, p. 87–95. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmy033. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2023.

ELIOT, Lance B. Robustness and Overcoming Brittleness of AI-Enabled Legal Micro-Directives: The Role of Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning. Computer Science – Computers and Society. Cornell University. 2020. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02243v1# . Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

ESPOSITO, Elena. Transparency Versus Explanation: The Role of Ambiguity in Legal AI”. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Research in Computational Law, v. 1, n. 2. 2021. Disponível em: https://journalcrcl.org/crcl/article/view/10. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2023.

FRANKLIN, James. Discussion paper: how much of commonsense and legal reasoning is formalizable? A review of conceptual obstacles. Law, Probability and Risk, [S.l.], v. 11, p. 225-245, 2012. Advance. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgs007. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2024.

GOWDER, P. Is legal cognition computational? (When will DeepVehicle replace Judge Hercules?). In: Whalen, Ryan (Ed.) Computational Legal Studies: The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Research. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2020. p. 215-237 Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977456.00015. Acesso em: 18 jun. 2023.

HOOFT, S. Van. Ética da virtude. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2006.

KNUTH, Donald E. The Art of Computer Programming, v. 2: Seminumerical Algorithms. Estados Unidos da América: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1969.

LIVERMORE, Michael A. Rule by Rules. Prepared for Computational Legal Studies: The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Legal Research. In: WHALEN, Ryan (ed.). Forthcoming 2019. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3387701. Acesso em: 2 jun. 2024.

MCCARTHY, John; DREYFUS, Hubert L. What Computers Still Can't Do: a critique of artificial reason. Cambridge: The MIT Press 1996.

MICHELON, Claudio. Practical Wisdom in Legal Decision-Making. University of Edinburgh School of Law Working, n. 2010/13, 2010. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1585929. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2023.

SOLUM, Lawrence B., Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centered Theory of Judging. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, v. 34, n. 1/2, jan. 2003. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.369940. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2023.

TACCA, Adriano; ROCHA, Leonel Severo. Inteligência artificial: reflexos no sistema do direito. NOMOS: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da UFC, Fortaleza, v.38, n.2, jul./dez., 2018, p.53-68

VANDERSTICHELE, Genevieve. Reasoning in court with the outcome of a machine learning algorithm with case law as an input. [s.l.]. 2020. Disponível em: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2632/MIREL-19_paper_2.pdf. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2023.