Moderación de las capacidades dinámicas en la relación entre el capital intelectual y el desempeño innovador en empresas chapecoenses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/2024.26087Palabras clave:
capital intelectual, desempeño innovador, capacidades dinámicas, empresas, Chapecó (SC)Resumen
Propósito: El propósito de este estudio es investigar la relación entre el capital intelectual, la capacidad dinámica y el desempeño innovador en micro y pequeñas empresas situadas en el municipio de Chapecó (SC), Brasil.
Metodología: Se utilizó un enfoque cuantitativo descriptivo, aplicando una encuesta estructurada con una escala Likert de cinco puntos. El cuestionario se distribuyó a gerentes financieros y/o socios-propietarios de micro y pequeñas empresas en Chapecó, resultando en 121 respuestas válidas. Los datos fueron analizados utilizando pruebas de correlación, análisis de regresión lineal múltiple y prueba ANOVA.
Originalidad: Este estudio se destaca por su enfoque específico en un contexto regional, explorando la relación entre el capital intelectual, la capacidad dinámica y el desempeño innovador en micro y pequeñas empresas en Chapecó (SC), Brasil, llenando así una laguna de conocimiento identificada en la literatura.
Resultados: Los resultados indican que el desempeño innovador de las empresas está influenciado positivamente por relaciones cercanas con proveedores, el uso de tecnología para integrar procesos internos y la capacidad de los empleados para anticipar cambios económicos y tomar decisiones estratégicas. La tecnología, cuando es moderada por la capacidad dinámica, resultó ser particularmente efectiva en la mejora de la eficiencia y rapidez en la innovación.
Contribuciones Teóricas: El estudio refuerza la importancia del capital humano y la tecnología en la innovación. También demuestra que las relaciones cercanas con proveedores y el uso efectivo de la tecnología son cruciales para el desempeño innovador, ofreciendo nuevas ideas sobre cómo se aplican estas dinámicas en un contexto regional específico.
Descargas
Citas
Ahmed, A., Bhatti, S. H., Gölgeci, I. & Arslan, A. (2022). Digital platform capability and organizational agility of emerging market manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of intellectual capital and the moderating role of environmental dynamism. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121513
Arshad, M. Z., Arshad, D., Lamsali, H., Alshuaibi, A. S. I., Alshuaibi, M. S. I., Albashar, G., Shakoor, A. & Chuah, L. F. (2023). Strategic resources alignment for sustainability: The impact of innovation capability and intellectual capital on SME's performance. Moderating role of external environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 137884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137884
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120. http://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), pp. 256-280. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
Bayu, F., Berhan, E. & Ebinger, F. (2022). A System Dynamics Model for Dynamic Capability Driven Sustainability Management. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010056
Bechtel, J., Kaufmann, C. & Kock, A. (2023). The interplay between dynamic capabilities’ dimensions and their relationship to project portfolio agility and success. International Journal of Project Management, 41(4), 102469. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102469
Bollen, L., Vergauwen, P. & Schnieders, S. (2005). Linking intellectual capital and intellectual property to company performance. Management Decision, 43(9), pp. 1161-1185. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510626254
Bonner, J. M. & Walker, O. C. Jr. (2004). Selecting influential business‐to‐business customers in new product development: relational embeddedness and knowledge heterogeneity considerations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(3), pp. 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00067.x
Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142
Chang, Y.‐Y., Wannamakok, W. & Lin, Y.‐H. (2023). Work conformity as a double-edged sword: Disentangling intra-firm social dynamics and employees' innovative performance in technology-intensive firms. Asia Pacific Management Review. 28(4), pp. 439-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2023.01.003
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Curado, C. (2008). Perceptions of knowledge management and intellectual capital in the banking industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810875921
Day, G. S. & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200201
Denford, J. S. (2013). Building knowledge: Developing a knowledge‐based dynamic capabilities typology. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), pp. 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311315150
Dwivedi, Y. K., Balakrishnan, J., Das, R. & Dutot, V. (2023). Resistance to innovation: A dynamic capability model based enquiry into retailers’ resistance to blockchain adaptation. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113632
El Maalouf, N. & Bahemia, H. (2023). The implementation of inbound open innovation at the firm level: A dynamic capability perspective. Technovation, 122, 102659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102659
Fávero, J. D., Pereira, P. E. J., Gomes, G. & Carvalho, L. C. de C. (2020). Gestão do capital intelectual e da capacidade absortiva como fundamentos do desempenho inovador. Revista Gestão Organizacional, 13(2), pp. 85-103. https://doi.org/10.22277/rgo.v13i2.5107
Fernandez-Pinto, H., Duarte, C. A. M., Villamizar, S. P. & Suarez, J. E. S. (2024). Horizontal innovation: The core of open innovation in the construction of the dynamic capacities in the Colombian industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100229
Han, Y. & Li, D. (2015). Effects of intellectual capital on innovative performance: The role of knowledge-based dynamic capability. Management Decision, 53(1), pp. 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2013-0411
Hossain, M., Islam, K. Z., Sayeed, M. A. & Kauranen, I. (2016). A comprehensive review of open innovation literature. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 7(1), pp. 2-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2015-0009
Hsu, L.‐C. & Wang, C.‐H. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: The mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal of Management, 23(2), pp. 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00718.x
Hunt, S. D. & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900201
Jácome, N. R., Medina-Tovar, F., Rodríguez-Herás, J., Vásquez-Peñaloza, L. & Gómez-Charris, Y. (2022). Model for the development of innovation as a dynamic capability for an organization in the furniture industry. Procedia Computer Science, 198, pp. 542-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.283
Kaya, B., Abubakar, A. M., Behravesh, E., Yildiz, H. & Mert, I. S. (2020). Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Journal of Business Research, 114, pp. 278-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.016
Landroguez, S. M., Castro, C. B. & Cepeda-Carrion, G. (2011). Creating dynamic capabilities to increase customer value. Management Decision, 49(7), pp. 1141-1159. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111151181
Li, D. & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), pp. 2793-2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007
Li, X., Wu, T., Zhang, H. J. & Yang, D. Y. (2023). National innovation systems and the achievement of sustainable development goals: Effect of knowledge-based dynamic capability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100310
Lu, Q., Meng, X., Su, J., Ming, A. A. K., Wu, Y. & Wang, C. (2023). TMT functional background heterogeneity and SMEs’ performance: The role of dynamic capabilities and business environment. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113807
Luo, Y., Huang, Y. & Wang, S. L. (2012). Guanxi and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), pp. 139-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00273.x
Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), pp. 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.158
Martín-de-Castro, G., Delgado-Verde, M., López-Sáez, P. & Navas-López, J. E. (2011). Towards ‘an intellectual capital-based view of the firm’: Origins and nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, pp. 649-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0644-5
Montibeller Filho, G. & Gargioni, S. L. (2014). Desenvolvimento da Região Sul do Brasil. In: Montoro, G. C. F. et al. (ed.). Um olhar territorial para o desenvolvimento: Sul. Rio de Janeiro: Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social, pp. 310-325. http://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/handle/1408/3682
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp. 242-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Nielsen, A. P. (2006). Understanding dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), pp. 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610679363
Ozgun, A. H., Tarim, M., Delen, D. & Zaim, S. (2022). Social capital and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation activities and intellectual capital. Healthcare Analytics, 2, 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.health.2022.100046
Prefeitura Municipal de Chapecó – PMC. (2023). Valor Adicionado. http://www.chapeco.sc.gov.br/
Reed, R. & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), pp. 88-102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308277
Roberts, N. & Grover, V. (2012). Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm's customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(4), pp. 231-270. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280409
Sequeira, B. (2008). Aprendizagem Organizacional e a Gestão do Conhecimento: Uma abordagem multidisciplinar. Artigo apresentado no IV Congresso Português da Sociologia, Mundos Sociais: saberes e práticas. APS-Associação Portuguesa de Sociologia, pp. 1-15. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/4445
Serenko, A. & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), pp. 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311315231
Subramaniam, M. & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), pp. 450-463. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), pp. 55-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165943
Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), pp. 1395-1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), pp. 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), pp. 996-1004. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443
Urban, B. & Joubert, G. C. D. S. (2017). Drivers of intellectual capital and organisational performance: a focus on human capital, structural capital and relational capital. Journal of Contemporary Management, 14(1), pp. 1243-1272. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-e8370fbe0
Van Vo, H. & Nguyen, N. P. (2023). Greening the Vietnamese supply chain: The influence of green logistics knowledge and intellectual capital. Heliyon, 9(5), e15953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15953
Vogel, R. & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), pp. 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
Wang, E., Klein, G. & Jiang, J. J. (2007). IT support in manufacturing firms for a knowledge management dynamic capability link to performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(11), pp. 2419-2434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601020437
Widener, S. K. (2006). Human capital, pay structure, and the use of performance measures in bonus compensation. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), pp. 198-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.06.001
Wu, S.‐H., Lin, L.‐Y. & Hsu, M.‐Y. (2007). Intellectual capital, dynamic capabilities and innovative performance of organisations. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(3-4), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2007.013496
Zahra, S. A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), pp. 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Zhang, Z., Wang, X. & Chun, D. (2022). The effect of knowledge sharing on ambidextrous innovation: Triadic intellectual capital as a mediator. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010025
Zheng, S., Zhang, W. & Du, J. (2011). Knowledge‐based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179352
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Marcio Gobbato, Claudio Alcides Jacoski, Givanildo Silva
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
