Cross-national distance impact on FDI strategic decisions into Portugal: Evidence from Eurozone and Ibero-America

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v18i4.10971

Palabras clave:

Cross-national distance, Eurozone, FDI, Ibero-America, Portugal

Resumen

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess if MNEs from the Eurozone and Ibero-America have different sensitivities to cross-national distance when investing in Portugal, by comparison with non-Eurozone and non Ibero-American MNEs.

Methodology: Using qualitative variables on a panel data analysis, we are able to assess the differentiated effects of cross-national distance on MNEs from members and non-members of both groups of countries.

Findings: Results suggest that sensitivities are indeed differentiated, with a notable exception of administrative distance which remains with a negative effect throughout all groups.

Originality: This research contributes to international business/management literature in the extent that it explores the relationship between cross-national distance and one of the most important international strategic decisions, FDI. It also addresses Portugal’s monetary integration in the Eurozone and the historic and cultural ties with Ibero-American countries.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Marcelo Pereira Duarte, University of Coimbra, Faculty of Economics

Master in Management by Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra. PhD Student / Invited Professor in Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra.

Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, CeBER - Center for Business and Economics Research (University of Coimbra, Faculty of Economics)

PhD in Ciencies Economiques i Empresarials by Facultat de Ciêncies Econòmiques i Empresarials, Universitat de Barcelona. Professor in Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra.

Citas

Bailey, N., & Li, S. (2015). Cross-national distance and FDI: The moderating role of host country local demand. Journal of International Management, 21(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2014.11.002

Baltagi, B. H. (2015). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (5th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Baltagi, B. H., & Chang, Y.-J. (1994). Incomplete panels: A comparative study of alternative estimators for the unbalanced one-way error component regression model. Journal of Econometrics, 62(2), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)90017-5

Barbosa, N., Guimarães, P., & Woodward, D. (2004). Foreign firm entry in an open economy: The case of Portugal. Applied Economics, 36(5), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840410001682160

Bénassy-Quéré, A., Coupet, M., & Mayer, T. (2007). Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment. The World Economy, 30(5), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01022.x

Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.28

Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400277

Cechella, C. (2010). The influence of cultural affinity for the boost of Brazilian investment in Portugal. Presented at 50th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Sustainable Regional Growth and Development in the Creative Knowledge Economy”, 19-23 August. Jönköping, Sweden. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/118894 (accessed 19 October 2018).

Cechella, C., Franco, G. H. B., Silva, J. R., & Dentinho, T. P. (2014). New dimensions of Brazilian economy internationalization: Portugal as a strategic location for Embraer’s investments and their impact on the regional economy. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 35, 3–13.

Cechella, C., Silva, J. R., Silveira, P. J. Á., & Dentinho, T. P. (2009). Os investimentos das empresas brasileiras em Portugal: Dez casos de estudo em empresas de grande porte. Presented at 15o Congresso APDR: “Redes e Desenvolvimento Regional”, 6-11 July. Cidade da Praia, Cabo Verde. Retrieved from http://www.apdr.pt/congresso/2009/pdf/Sess%C3%A3o%209/105A.pdf (accessed 19 October 2018).

Conti, C. R., Parente, R., & de Vasconcelos, F. C. (2016). When distance does not matter: Implications for Latin American multinationals. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 1980–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.144

De Sousa, J., & Lochard, J. (2006). Union monétaire et ide. Revue Économique, 57(3), 419-430. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.573.0419

Duarte, M. P., & Carvalho, F. (2018). Institutional distance and multinational enterprises’ FDI decisions in Portugal. European Journal of Applied Business and Management, 4(3), 1–29.

Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

EY. (2017). EY Portugal attractiveness survey - Portugal is on Europe’s radar. Lisboa

EY. (2018). EY Portugal attractiveness survey - The perception of Portugal leading FDI in Europe: recent hype or lasting trend? Lisboa.

Faria, M. P., Carvalho, F., & Reis, N. R. (2018). The impact of corruption distance on ownership strategies of Spanish and Portuguese MNEs. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 17(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v17i1.2603

Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309

Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.

Guler, I., & Guillén, M. F. (2010). Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.35

Hasan, M. M., Ibrahim, Y., & Uddin, M. M. (2016). Institutional distance factors influencing firm performance: A hypothetical framework from cross-border mergers and acquisitions. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2016.0144

Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00066

Henisz, W. J., & Williamson, O. E. (1999). Comparative economic organization — Within and between countries. Business and Politics, 1(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap.1999.1.3.261

Hernández, V., & Nieto, M. J. (2015). The effect of the magnitude and direction of institutional distance on the choice of international entry modes. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.02.002

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences inwork-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Hörnell, E., Vahlne, J.-E., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1973). Exports an foreign establishments. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell.

Hsiao, C. (2004). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutzschenreuter, T., Kleindienst, I., & Lange, S. (2016). The concept of distance in international business research: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12065

Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008). Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 540–561. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400375

Jiménez, A., & de la Fuente, D. (2016). Learning from others: The impact of vicarious experience on the psychic distance and FDI relationship. Management International Review, 56(5), 633–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0269-0

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). Process of the the internationalization development firm - A model of knowledge foreign and increasing market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1057

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24

Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm - Four swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1975.tb00514.x

Kang, J., Lee, J. Y., & Ghauri, P. N. (2017). The interplay of mahalanobis distance and firm capabilities on MNC subsidiary exits from host countries. Management International Review, 57(3), 379–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0287-6

Kester, W. C. (1996). American and japanese corporate governance: Convergence to best practice? In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism (pp. 107–137). Ithaca, United States: Cornell University Press.

Kilic, C., Bayar, Y., & Arica, F. (2014). Effects of currency unions on foreign direct investment inflows: The European Economic and Monetary Union case. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(1), 8–15.

Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394

La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042

Lane, P. R., & Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2018). The external wealth of nations revisited: International financial integration in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. IMF Economic Review, 66(1), 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-017-0048-y

Lavie, D., & Miller, S. R. (2008). Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science, 19(4), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0341

Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of National Institute of Sciences of India, 2(1), 49–55.

Murteira, B., Ribeiro, C. S., Silva, J. A. e, & Pimenta, C. (2007). Introdução à estatística (2nd ed.). Lisboa: McGraw-Hill.

Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (pp. 3–21). New York: Oxford University Press.

O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

OECD. (2008). OECD benchmark definition of foreign direct investment: Fourth edition (4th ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investmentstatisticsandanalysis/40193734.pdf (accessed 17 August 2018).

Pajunen, K. (2008). Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400371

Pattnaik, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2014). Distance and divestment of Korean MNC affiliates: The moderating role of entry mode and experience. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(1), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2013.815454

Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982

Silva, J. R. (2008). Internationalization strategies in Iberoamerica - The case of Portuguese trade (project document). Santiago do Chile: United Nations

Simões, V. C., & Cartaxo, R. M. (2013). Inward FDI and its policy context, 2011. In K. P. Sauvant, P. Mallampally, & G. McAllister (Eds.), Inward and Outward FDI Country Profiles (2nd ed., pp. 479–495). New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.

Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/143141

UNCTAD. (2018). World Investment Report 2018: Investment and new industrial policies. Geneva.

Vahlne, J.-E., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1973). Economic distance: Model and empirical investigation. In E. Hörnell (Ed.), Export and foreign establishments (pp. 81–159). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell.

Werner, S. (2002). Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, 28(3), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800303

Whitley, R. (1992). Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. S., & Nachum, L. (2012). Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.43

Zhang, M. M. (2015). Cross-national distance and insidership within networks: Japanese MNCs’ ownership strategies in their overseas subsidiaries. Asia Pacific Business Review, 21(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2015.1020649

Descargas

Publicado

2019-10-11

Cómo citar

Duarte, M. P., & Carvalho, F. M. P. de O. (2019). Cross-national distance impact on FDI strategic decisions into Portugal: Evidence from Eurozone and Ibero-America. Revista Ibero-Americana De Estratégia, 18(4), 508–534. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v18i4.10971

Número

Sección

Articles