Interrelation of practices and strategic routines in the performance of university research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/2023.23998Keywords:
strategy-as-practice, dynamic of routines, strategic results, research performance.Abstract
Purpose: This study sheds light on the relationship between two perspectives, the strategy-as-practice (SAP) approach and the dynamic aspect of routines. We seek to understand how the interrelationship between practices and routines reflect on university corporate results.
Methodology: We conducted a case study in a postgraduate program in management at a not-for-profit university focusing on university research activities. 42 interviews were carried out, 19 observations were made in formal and informal social events and institutional documents were collected from the program and from the governmental body that regulates stricto sensu postgraduate studies in Brazil.
Originality: The existing research suggests the approximation of these perspectives – SAP and dynamic routines – and the need to integrate them to deepen the understanding of the strategic phenomenon.
Main Results: Our results indicate that program strategies are aligned with regulatory and funding bodies and multiple practices and routines relate to and complement the range of research performance outcomes. Academic training, previous experiences and specific skills influence the behavior of actors, while tools and interactions play crucial roles in conducting research, shaping approaches and results, essential in academic research.
Theoretical contributions: The article contributes through understandings about the existence of different interdependent and complementary relationships in the strategic process of a postgraduate program that condition the behavior of the actors involved and the research performance achieved.
Downloads
References
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). Co-Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 957–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
Appiah, G., & Sarpong, D. (2015). On the influence of organisational routines on strategic foresight. Foresight, 17(5), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2014-0067
Akerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794775
Belmondo, C., & Roussel, C. S. (2014, May 26th). Strategising Routines As the Missing Link Between Strategy Practices and Praxis. Article presented at the 13th Conference Internationale de Management Stratégique 2014, Rennes, France.
Biggiero, L. (2017). Looking at the Skeleton of University Research Performance A Pilot Study on an Italian University. Procedia Computer Science, 106: 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.036
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bulgacov, S., & Verdu, F. C. (2001). Redes de pesquisadores da área de administração: um estudo exploratório. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 5: 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552001000500009
Burgelman, R. A., Floyd, S. W., Laamanen, T., Mantere, S., Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2018). Strategy processes and practices: Dialogues and intersections. Strategic Management Journal, 39:531–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2741
Cohendet, P. S., & Simon, L. O. (2016). Always Playable: Recombining Routines for Creative Efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s Video Game Studio. Organization Science, 27: 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1062
Crubellate, J. M., Rossoni, L., Mello, C. M. de, & Valenzuela, J. B. (2008). Strategic Responses to CAPES Assessment System in Management Post-Graduate Programs: Institutional Propositions Based on Co-Authorship Networks of Researchers in Paraná State, Brazil. Revista de Negócios, 12: 77–92.
da Costa Júnior, J. C., Nascimento, L. D. S., Jerônimo, T. D. B., & Granja, B. C. A. (2022). Exploring the Practice Rationality, Strategy as Practice, and Epistemologies of the South: Towards Wider Strategic Research. Philosophy of Management, 1: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00222-3
Dantas, F. (2004). Responsabilidade social e pós-graduação no Brasil: ideias para (avali)ação. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, 1: 160–172. https://doi.org/10.21713/2358-2332.2004.v1.46
Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60: 179–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075288
Didier, J. M. O. L., & Lucena, E. de A. (2008). Aprendizagem de praticantes da estratégia: contribuições da aprendizagem situada e da aprendizagem pela experiência. Organizações & Sociedade, 15: 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-92302008000100007
Dönmez, D., Grote, G., & Brusoni, S. (2016). Routine interdependencies as a source of stability and flexibility. A study of agile software development teams. Information and Organization, 26: 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2016.07.001
Edgar, F., & Geare, A. (2013). Factors influencing university research performance. Studies in Higher Education, 38: 774–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.601811
Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science, 11: 611–629. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
Feldman, M. S. (2003). A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 727–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.4.727
Feldman, M. S. (2015). Theory of routine dynamics and connections to strategy as practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (pp. 317–330). Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory. Organization Science, 22: 1240–1253. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
Feldman, M. S., & Rafaeli, A. (2002). Organizational Routines as Sources of Connections and Understandings. Journal of Management Studies, 39: 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00294
Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., & Seidl, D. (2021). What is routine dynamics?. In M. Feldman, B. Pentland, L. D'Adderio, K. Dittrich, C. Rerup, & D. Seidl (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (pp. 1-18). Cambridge University Press.
Festinalli, R. C. (2005). A formação de mestres em administração: por onde caminhamos? Organizações & Sociedade, 12(35), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-92302005000400008
Freitas, M. F. Q., & Souza, J. (2018). Pensar a formação e a pesquisa na pós-graduação stricto sensu. Educar Em Revista, 34: 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.62549
Fussy, D. S. (2018). The hurdles to fostering research in Tanzanian universities. Higher Education, 77: 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0276-8
Gao, D., Squazzoni, F., & Deng, X. (2018). The role of cognitive artifacts in organizational routine dynamics: an agent-based model. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 24: 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9263-y
Giddens, A. (1984). A constituição da sociedade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Grand, S., & Bartl, D. (2019). Making New Strategic Moves Possible: How Executive Management Enacts Strategizing Routines to Strengthen Entrepreneurial Agility. In Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (pp. 123–151). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Hansen, N. K., & Vogel, R. (2011). Organizational routines: a review and outlook on practice-based micro-foundations. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 6:86–111.
Hoon, C. (2007). Committees as strategic practice: The role of strategic conversation in a public administration. Human Relations, 60: 921–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707080081
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: an activity-based approach. London: Sage Publications.
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. (2007). Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60: 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707075703
Jarzabkowski, P., Kaplan, S., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2016). On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research. Strategic Organization, 14: 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015604125
Jarzabkowski, P., & Spee, A. P. (2009). Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11: 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00250.x
Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, A. P., & Smets, M. (2013). Material artifacts: Practices for doing strategy with ‘stuff.’ European Management Journal, 31: 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.09.001
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E., & Rabetino, R. (2022). Making connections: Harnessing the diversity of strategy‐as‐practice research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24: 210-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12274
Kremser, W. (2017). Interdependente Routinen. In Interdependente Routinen. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15276-5
Kremser, W., Pentland, B. T., & Brunswicker, S. (2019). Interdependence Within and Between Routines: A Performative Perspective. In Routine dynamics in action: replication and transformation. (pp. 79–98). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000061005
Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research policy and academic performativity: compliance, contestation and complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38: 1162–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.833025
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.
Locke, K., Golden-Biddle, K., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Perspective - Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization science, 19: 907-918. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0398
Lundgren, M., & Blom, M. (2015). Textual objects and strategizing: the influence of documents as active objects on strategic recursiveness. Journal of Change Management, 16: 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2015.1120765
March, J., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Oxford, England: Wiley.
Mello, C. M. de, Crubellate, J. M., & Rossoni, L. (2010). Dinâmica de relacionamento e prováveis respostas estratégicas de programas brasileiros de pós-graduação em administração à avaliação da Capes: proposições institucionais a partir da análise de redes de co-autorias. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14(3), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552010000300004
Meyer, V., & Lopes, M. C. B. (2015). Administrando o imensurável: uma crítica às organizações acadêmicas. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 13: 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395117485
Meyer, V., Pascucci, L., & Mangolin, L. (2012). Gestão estratégica: um exame de práticas em universidades privadas. Revista de Administração Pública, 46: 49–70.
Meyer, V., Pascucci, L., & Meyer, B. (2018). Strategies in Universities: Tensions Between Macro Intentions and Micro Actions. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22: 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018160081
Milagres, R. das M., Rezende, O., & Goncalves, C. A. (2015). Strategic Implementation: An Analysis From Routines. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9:25–47.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 114–132.
Nguyen, H. T. L., & Meek, V. L. (2016). Key Problems in Organizing and Structuring University Research in Vietnam: The Lack of an Effective Research “Behaviour Formalization” System. Minerva, 54: 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9289-6
Odelius, C. C., Abbad, G. D. S., Resende Jr., P. C., Sena, A. D. C., Viana, C. R., Freitas, T. L., & Santos, T. C. N. D. (2011). Processos de aprendizagem, competências aprendidas, funcionamento, compartilhamento e armazenagem de conhecimentos em grupos de pesquisa. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 9: 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512011000100012.
Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth070
Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action. Information and Organization, 18: 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001
Pentland, B. T., & Hærem, T. (2015). Organizational Routines as Patterns of Action: Implications for Organizational Behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2: 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412
Rese, N., Casali, A. M., & Canhada, D. I. D. (2011). Reflexões iniciais sobre comunicação organizacional na abordagem da estratégia como prática social. Gestão e Sociedade, 5:42–56.
Royer, I., & Daniel, A. (2019). Organizational Routines and Institutional Maintenance: The Influence of Legal Artifacts. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28: 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617730402
Rosa, R. A.; Kremser, W.; & Bulgacov, S. (2021). Routine Interdependence. In M. Feldman, B. Pentland, L. D'Adderio, K. Dittrich, C. Rerup, & D. Seidl (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (pp. 244 - 254). Cambridge University Press.
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2005). Strategic Practice, “Discourse” and the Everyday Interactional Constitution of “Power Effects.” Organization, 12: 803–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405057472
Santos, G. T., & Silva, A. B. (2019). “Diving” into the meanings and revealing conceptions of being a professor in management. Revista de Administracao Mackenzie, 20:1-34 https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMG190144
Schmidt, E. K., & Graversen, E. K. (2017). Persistent factors facilitating excellence in research environments. Higher Education, 75:341–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1073401701420
Seidl, D. A. V. I. D., Grossmann-Hensel, B., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2021). Strategy as practice and routine dynamics. In M. Feldman, B. Pentland, L. D'Adderio, K. Dittrich, C. Rerup, & D. Seidl (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (pp. 481-500). Cambridge University Press.
Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2014). Enlarging the Strategy-as-Practice Research Agenda: Towards Taller and Flatter Ontologies. Organization Studies, 35:1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614541886
Sele, K., & Grand, S. (2016). Unpacking the Dynamics of Ecologies of Routines: Mediators and Their Generative Effects in Routine Interactions. Organization Science, 27: 722–738. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1031
Silva, A. B. da. (2019). Produtivismo Acadêmico Multinível: Mercadoria Performativa Na Pós-Graduação Em Administração. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 59: 341–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020190504
Silva, F. O., & Hansen, P. B. (2012). Inserindo a estratégia como prática no campo dos estudos organizacionais: uma proposta de método de aplicação a partir de um caso prático. Revista Brasileira de Estratégia, 5: 255–267. https://doi.org/10.7213/rebrae.6069
Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
Souza Neto, J., & Borges, J. F. (2019). As narrativas dos stakeholders sob a perspectiva da estratégia como prática social. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 20: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMR190118
Spee, A. P., Jarzabkowski, P., & Smets, M. (2016). The Influence of Routine Interdependence and Skillful Accomplishment on the Coordination of Standardizing and Customizing. Organization Science, 27: 759–781. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1050
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Stańczyk-Hugiet, E. (2018). Strategizing routine revisited: theoretical roots, determinants, and consequences. Journal of Economics & Management, 32: 102–117. https://doi.org/ 10.22367/jem.2018.32.07
Takahashi, A. R. W., & Sarsur, A. M. (2012). A liderança em organizações educacionais: jogando luz sobre a administração em “empresas do ensino.” Teoria e Prática em Administração, 2: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21714/2238-104X2012v2i2-12535
Tate, M., Campbell-Meier, J., & Sudfelt, R. (2018). Organizational routines and teaching innovations: a case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 23: 885–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1437132
Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously. The Academy of Management Annals, 6: 285–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.672039
Villar, E. G. (2018). As interações entre os atores da pós-graduação stricto sensu em Administração: uma análise do indivíduo e da coletividade. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina, 11: 47–69. https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2018v11n2p47
Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29: 731–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00068-4
Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research. Organization Studies, 27: 613–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606064101
Wilson, D. C., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Thinking and acting strategically: New challenges for interrogating strategy. European Management Review, 1: 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500008
Witte, K., & Rogge, N. (2010). To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance. Scientometrics, 85: 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0286-5
Wood, T., & Chueke, G. V. (2008). Ranking de produção científica em administração de empresas no Brasil. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 9: 13–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-69712008000400003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
