Cross-national distance impact on FDI strategic decisions into Portugal: Evidence from Eurozone and Ibero-America

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v18i4.10971

Keywords:

Cross-national distance, Eurozone, FDI, Ibero-America, Portugal

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assess if MNEs from the Eurozone and Ibero-America have different sensitivities to cross-national distance when investing in Portugal, by comparison with non-Eurozone and non Ibero-American MNEs.

Methodology: Using qualitative variables on a panel data analysis, we are able to assess the differentiated effects of cross-national distance on MNEs from members and non-members of both groups of countries.

Findings: Results suggest that sensitivities are indeed differentiated, with a notable exception of administrative distance which remains with a negative effect throughout all groups.

Originality: This research contributes to international business/management literature in the extent that it explores the relationship between cross-national distance and one of the most important international strategic decisions, FDI. It also addresses Portugal’s monetary integration in the Eurozone and the historic and cultural ties with Ibero-American countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcelo Pereira Duarte, University of Coimbra, Faculty of Economics

Master in Management by Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra. PhD Student / Invited Professor in Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra.

Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, CeBER - Center for Business and Economics Research (University of Coimbra, Faculty of Economics)

PhD in Ciencies Economiques i Empresarials by Facultat de Ciêncies Econòmiques i Empresarials, Universitat de Barcelona. Professor in Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra.

References

Bailey, N., & Li, S. (2015). Cross-national distance and FDI: The moderating role of host country local demand. Journal of International Management, 21(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2014.11.002

Baltagi, B. H. (2015). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (5th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Baltagi, B. H., & Chang, Y.-J. (1994). Incomplete panels: A comparative study of alternative estimators for the unbalanced one-way error component regression model. Journal of Econometrics, 62(2), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)90017-5

Barbosa, N., Guimarães, P., & Woodward, D. (2004). Foreign firm entry in an open economy: The case of Portugal. Applied Economics, 36(5), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840410001682160

Bénassy-Quéré, A., Coupet, M., & Mayer, T. (2007). Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment. The World Economy, 30(5), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01022.x

Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.28

Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400277

Cechella, C. (2010). The influence of cultural affinity for the boost of Brazilian investment in Portugal. Presented at 50th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Sustainable Regional Growth and Development in the Creative Knowledge Economy”, 19-23 August. Jönköping, Sweden. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/118894 (accessed 19 October 2018).

Cechella, C., Franco, G. H. B., Silva, J. R., & Dentinho, T. P. (2014). New dimensions of Brazilian economy internationalization: Portugal as a strategic location for Embraer’s investments and their impact on the regional economy. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 35, 3–13.

Cechella, C., Silva, J. R., Silveira, P. J. Á., & Dentinho, T. P. (2009). Os investimentos das empresas brasileiras em Portugal: Dez casos de estudo em empresas de grande porte. Presented at 15o Congresso APDR: “Redes e Desenvolvimento Regional”, 6-11 July. Cidade da Praia, Cabo Verde. Retrieved from http://www.apdr.pt/congresso/2009/pdf/Sess%C3%A3o%209/105A.pdf (accessed 19 October 2018).

Conti, C. R., Parente, R., & de Vasconcelos, F. C. (2016). When distance does not matter: Implications for Latin American multinationals. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 1980–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.144

De Sousa, J., & Lochard, J. (2006). Union monétaire et ide. Revue Économique, 57(3), 419-430. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.573.0419

Duarte, M. P., & Carvalho, F. (2018). Institutional distance and multinational enterprises’ FDI decisions in Portugal. European Journal of Applied Business and Management, 4(3), 1–29.

Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

EY. (2017). EY Portugal attractiveness survey - Portugal is on Europe’s radar. Lisboa

EY. (2018). EY Portugal attractiveness survey - The perception of Portugal leading FDI in Europe: recent hype or lasting trend? Lisboa.

Faria, M. P., Carvalho, F., & Reis, N. R. (2018). The impact of corruption distance on ownership strategies of Spanish and Portuguese MNEs. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 17(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v17i1.2603

Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035309

Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.

Guler, I., & Guillén, M. F. (2010). Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.35

Hasan, M. M., Ibrahim, Y., & Uddin, M. M. (2016). Institutional distance factors influencing firm performance: A hypothetical framework from cross-border mergers and acquisitions. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2016.0144

Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00066

Henisz, W. J., & Williamson, O. E. (1999). Comparative economic organization — Within and between countries. Business and Politics, 1(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap.1999.1.3.261

Hernández, V., & Nieto, M. J. (2015). The effect of the magnitude and direction of institutional distance on the choice of international entry modes. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.02.002

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences inwork-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Hörnell, E., Vahlne, J.-E., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1973). Exports an foreign establishments. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell.

Hsiao, C. (2004). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutzschenreuter, T., Kleindienst, I., & Lange, S. (2016). The concept of distance in international business research: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12065

Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008). Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 540–561. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400375

Jiménez, A., & de la Fuente, D. (2016). Learning from others: The impact of vicarious experience on the psychic distance and FDI relationship. Management International Review, 56(5), 633–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0269-0

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). Process of the the internationalization development firm - A model of knowledge foreign and increasing market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1057

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24

Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm - Four swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1975.tb00514.x

Kang, J., Lee, J. Y., & Ghauri, P. N. (2017). The interplay of mahalanobis distance and firm capabilities on MNC subsidiary exits from host countries. Management International Review, 57(3), 379–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0287-6

Kester, W. C. (1996). American and japanese corporate governance: Convergence to best practice? In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism (pp. 107–137). Ithaca, United States: Cornell University Press.

Kilic, C., Bayar, Y., & Arica, F. (2014). Effects of currency unions on foreign direct investment inflows: The European Economic and Monetary Union case. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(1), 8–15.

Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394

La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042

Lane, P. R., & Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2018). The external wealth of nations revisited: International financial integration in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. IMF Economic Review, 66(1), 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-017-0048-y

Lavie, D., & Miller, S. R. (2008). Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science, 19(4), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0341

Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.

Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of National Institute of Sciences of India, 2(1), 49–55.

Murteira, B., Ribeiro, C. S., Silva, J. A. e, & Pimenta, C. (2007). Introdução à estatística (2nd ed.). Lisboa: McGraw-Hill.

Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (pp. 3–21). New York: Oxford University Press.

O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

OECD. (2008). OECD benchmark definition of foreign direct investment: Fourth edition (4th ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investmentstatisticsandanalysis/40193734.pdf (accessed 17 August 2018).

Pajunen, K. (2008). Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400371

Pattnaik, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2014). Distance and divestment of Korean MNC affiliates: The moderating role of entry mode and experience. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(1), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2013.815454

Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982

Silva, J. R. (2008). Internationalization strategies in Iberoamerica - The case of Portuguese trade (project document). Santiago do Chile: United Nations

Simões, V. C., & Cartaxo, R. M. (2013). Inward FDI and its policy context, 2011. In K. P. Sauvant, P. Mallampally, & G. McAllister (Eds.), Inward and Outward FDI Country Profiles (2nd ed., pp. 479–495). New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.

Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/143141

UNCTAD. (2018). World Investment Report 2018: Investment and new industrial policies. Geneva.

Vahlne, J.-E., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1973). Economic distance: Model and empirical investigation. In E. Hörnell (Ed.), Export and foreign establishments (pp. 81–159). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell.

Werner, S. (2002). Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, 28(3), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800303

Whitley, R. (1992). Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. S., & Nachum, L. (2012). Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.43

Zhang, M. M. (2015). Cross-national distance and insidership within networks: Japanese MNCs’ ownership strategies in their overseas subsidiaries. Asia Pacific Business Review, 21(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2015.1020649

Downloads

Published

11.10.2019

How to Cite

Duarte, M. P., & Carvalho, F. M. P. de O. (2019). Cross-national distance impact on FDI strategic decisions into Portugal: Evidence from Eurozone and Ibero-America. Revista Ibero-Americana De Estratégia, 18(4), 508–534. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v18i4.10971

Issue

Section

Articles