When the team potency needs self-efficacy and adaptive selling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v18i1.3902Palabras clave:
Potency, Team, Performance, Self-efficacy, Adaptive sellingResumen
Given the competitive landscape in the sales field, more companies need to worry about training their salespeople, especially in cases which salespeople work together. The Team Effectiveness Theory has shown that team potency positively increases individual performance, yet little is known about its influence on group performance. In this work, we suggest that the effect of team potency on performance is not only direct, but also mediated by the mechanisms of self-efficacy and adaptive selling. The Cognitive Social Theory explains this mediation in series, since the individual who has beliefs in his sales skills (self-efficacy), shapes his behavior congruent to that of the client (adaptive selling), increasing sales outcomes. Data were collected from front-line employees in the banking segment, which confirm the authors' expectations for individual and team performance.Descargas
Citas
Ahearne, M., Mackenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., Mathieu, J.E., & Lam, S.K. (2010). The Role of Consensus in Sales Team Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 458–469. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.47.3.458
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2011). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of management, 38(1), 9-44. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410606
Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., and Mount M.K. (1998). “Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness”. Journal of Applied Psychology., 83(3), 377-391.
Behrman, D. N., & Perreault, W. D. (1982). Measuring the performance of industrial salespersons. Journal of Business Research, 10(3), 355-370. doi: 10.1016/0148-2963(82)90039-X
Borg, S. W., & Johnston, W. J. (2013). The IPS-EQ model: interpersonal skills and emotional intelligence in a sales process. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 33(1), 39-51. doi: 10.2753/PSS0885-3134330104
Brown, S. P., Jones, E., & Leigh, T. W. (2005). The attenuating effect of role overload on relationships linking self-efficacy and goal level to work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 972-979. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.972
Chakrabarty, S., Widing, R. E., & Brown, G. (2014). Selling behaviors and sales performance: the moderating and mediating effects of interpersonal mentalizing. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 34(2), 112-122. doi: 10.1080/08853134.2014.890899
Chen, C. C., & Jaramillo, F. (2014). The double-edged effects of emotional intelligence on the adaptive selling–salesperson-owned loyalty relationship. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 34(1), 33-50. doi: 10.1080/08853134.2013.870183
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage: London.
Franke, G.R., & Park, J.E. (2006). Salesperson Adaptive Selling Behavior and Customer Orientation: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 693–702. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.4.693
Fu, F. Q., Richards, K. A., Hughes, D. E., & Jones, E. (2010). Motivating salespeople to sell new products: The relative influence of attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 61-76. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.74.6.61
Gabler, C. B., Rapp, A., and Richey, R. G. (2014). “The effect of environmental orientation on salesperson effort and participation: the moderating role of organizational identification”. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 34(3), 173-187. doi:10.1080/08853134.2014.890906
Goncalo, J. A., Polman, E., & Maslach, C. (2010). Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(1), 13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.05.001
Gully, S.M., Joshi, A., Incaltecaterra, K.A., & Beaubien, J.M. (2002). A Meta-Analysis of Team-Efficacy, Potency, and Performance: Interdependence and Level of Analysis as Moderators of Observed Relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (5), 819-832. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 87-106. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x/full
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315-342). New York: Prentice Hall.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Ney York: Guilford Press.
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011). Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: an examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 851-862. doi: doi.org/10.1037/a0022465
Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262-279. doi: 10.2307/256188
Jong, A., Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M. (2005). Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Study of Self-Managing Service Teams. Management Science, 51(11), 1610–1625. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0425
Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107-127. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107
Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2003). Group potency and collective efficacy examining their predictive validity, level of analysis, and effects of performance feedback on future group performance. Group & Organization Management, 28(3), 366-391. doi: 10.1177/1059601102250821
Lester, S.W., Meglino, B.M., Korsgaard, M. A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: a longitudinal investigation of newly formed work group. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 352-368. doi: 10.2307/3069351
Locander, D. A., Mulki, J. P., & Weinberg, F. J. (2014). How do salespeople make decisions? The role of emotions and deliberation on adaptive selling, and the moderating role of intuition. Psychology & Marketing, 31(6), 387-403. doi: 10.1002/mar.20702
Maddux, J.E. (2000). Self-Efficacy: The Power Of Believing You Can. In Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds). Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marôco, J. (2014). Análise de equações estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. 2ed. ReportNumber, Lda.
Mcfarland, R.G., Challagalla, G.N., & Shervani, T.A. (2006). Influence Tactics for Effective Adaptive Selling. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 103–117. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.103
Monteiro, R. B., & Vieira, V. A. (2016). Team Potency and Its Impact on Performance via Self-efficacy and Adaptability. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 13(1), 98-119. doi: 10.1590/1807-7692bar2016150283
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, 36(4), 717-731. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553
Román, S., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of adaptive selling confidence and behavior: a dyadic analysis of salespeople and their customers. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 38(3), 363–382. doi: 10.1007/s11747-009-0166-9
Rubin, I. M., Plovnik, M. S., & Fry, R. E. (1978). Facilitator Manual to Accompany Task-oriented Team Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 863. doi: 10.1037/a0022625
Spiro, R.L., & Weitz, B.A. (1990). Adaptive Selling: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Nomological Validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), 61-69. doi: 10.2307/3172551
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
Stajkovic, A.D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A.J. (2009). Collective Efficacy, Group Potency, and Group Performance: Meta-Analyses of Their Relationships, and Test of a Mediation Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (3), 814–828. doi: 10.1037/a0015659
Tröster, C., Mehra, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Structuring for team success: The interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 245-255. doi: 10.1016j.obhdp.2014.04.003
Van der Bijl., J.J., & Shortridge-Baggett, L. M. (2002). The Theory and Measurement of the Self-Efficacy Construct. (Cap. 2, pp. 9-30). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Verbeke, W., Dietz, B., & Verwaal, E. (2011). Drivers of sales performance: a contemporary meta-analysis. Have salespeople become knowledge brokers?.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(3), 407-428. doi: 10.1007/s11747-010-0211-8
Weitz, B.A., Sujan, H., & Sujan, M. (1986). Knowledge, Motivation, and Adaptive Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 50 (4), 174-191. doi: 10.2307/1251294
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206. doi: 10.1086/651
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Brasileira de Marketing – Remark
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.