Os principais fundamentos do indicador MHP - Movimentos por Hora uma análise pelos portos catarinenses

Carlos Manuel Taboada Rodrigues; Evandro Moritz Luz; Júlio Cesar Schmitt Neto; Orestes Martinez Sosa

doi:10.5585/exactaep.v19n1.8603

Authors

Carlos Manuel Taboada Rodrigues UFSC - SC http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2328-378X
Evandro Moritz Luz UFSC http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6415-7213
Júlio Cesar Schmitt Neto Univali - SC http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-7953
Orestes Martinez Sosa Universidad Autonoma del Caribe http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-2540

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.v19n1.8603

Keywords:

Ports, Performance, MPH

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the main fundamentals that influence the measurement of performance indicator of movements per hour (MPH) of container with load. Maritime transport is the main mode used by the intense international trade, being the port an important strategic link of the international logistics. The Santa Catarina ports are present in a significant way in the Brazilian scenario in container handling, in this way this article contemplates a theoretical research and legitimized by means of a practical research in the application of a mixed questionnaire with the managers of five ports of Santa Catarina, in order to identify the main foundations of the MPH performance indicator. It was evidenced that the theoretical studies about the MPH indicator are confirmed in the practical research with the port managers, corroborating with the research, but initially so that in the future, uniform characteristics are adopted in the Brazilian and international port service.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayres, A. P. S. (2009). Gestão de logística e operações. Curitiba: IESDE Brasil S.A.

Barros, C. P. (2012). Productivity assessment of African seaports. African Development Review, 24(1), 67-78.

Batista, L. (2012). Translating trade and transport facilitation into strategic operations performance objectives. Supply Chain Management, 17(2), 124-137.

Bichou, K. (2013). An empirical study of the impacts of operating and market conditions on container-port efficiency and benchmarking. Research in Transportation Economics, 42(1), 28-37.

Boletim Portuário. 2015. 1º Trimestre. Portal Antaq. Disponível em: http://www.antaq.gov.br/Portal/pdf/BoletimPortuario/BoletimPortuarioPrimeiroTrimestre2015.pdf. Acessado em 27 Jun., 2016.

Castro, C. D. M. (1977). A prática da pesquisa, McGraw-Hill.

David, P., Stewart R. (2010). Logística internacional. São Paulo: Cengage Learning

GIL, A. C. (2010). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. São Paulo: Editora Atlas.

Gray, D. E. (2013). Doing research in the real world, Sage.

Golias, M. M., Saharidis, G. K., Boile, M., Theofanis, S., and Ierapetritou, M. G. (2009). The berth allocation problem: Optimizing vessel arrival time. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 11(4), 358-377.

Haralambides, H. E., Cariou, P., and Benacchio, M. (2002). Costs, benefits and pricing of dedicated container terminals. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 4(1), 21-34.

Hronec, J. (1997). Sinais vitais. São Paulo: Makron books.

Hung, S. W., Lu, W. M., & Wang, T. P. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 706-713.

Keedi, S. (2011). Transportes, unitização e seguros Internacionais de Carga: prática e exercícios. São Paulo: Aduaneiras.

López, R. C., & Poole, N. (1998). Quality assurance in the maritime port logistics chain: The case of Valencia, Spain. Supply Chain Management, 3(1), 33-44.

Lozano, S, Villa, G, & Canca, D. (2011). Application of centralized DEA approach to capital budgeting in Spanish ports. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(1), 455-465.

Milan, G. S., Vieira, G. B. B., & Gonçalves, R. B. (2014). Análise da eficiência portuária da região sul do Brasil. Simpósio de Administração da Produção, Logística e Operações Internacionais, XVII.

Narasimhan, A. and Palekar, U. S. (2002). Analysis and algorithms for the transtainer routing problem in container port operations. Transportation science, 36(1), 63-78.

Niavis, S, & Tsekeris, T. (2012). Ranking and causes of inefficiency of container seaports in South-Eastern Europe. European Transport Research Review, 4(1), 235-244.

Ramires, D. (2013). Ports: The Pending Tasks. Latin Trade. July-August.

Sharma, M. J., & Yu, S. J. (2010). Benchmark optimization and attribute identification for improvement. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 568-580.

Trujillo, L., González, M. M., & Jiménez, J. L. (2013). An overview on the reform process of African ports. Utilities Policy, 25(1), 12-22.

Wanke, P. (2013). Physical infrastructure and shipment consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian ports: Atwo-stagenet work-DEA approach. Journal Transport Policy, 29, 145-153.

Yuen, A. C. L., Zhang, A., & Cheung, W. (2013). Foreign participation and competition: a way to improve the container port efficiency in China? Transportation Research Part A, 49(1), 220-231.