Contributions of muscle mass to force production in different maturation stages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/conssaude.v10i3.2901Keywords:
Anthropometry, Muscle strength, Puberty.Abstract
Objectives: The aim in this study was to analyze the relationship between handgrip strength and muscle mass. Method: One hundred and forty five subjects (aged between 8 and 16 years) were divided into three groups: pre-puberty, puberty and post-puberty. The arm muscle area was estimated by anthropometry and skinfolds, and handgrip strength was evaluated with hydraulic dynamometer. The maturation stages were compared by using the Kruskall-Wallis test followed by U for Mann-Whitnney the location of differences. Spearman correlations was used to handgrip strength and muscle mass (p<0.05). Results: Handgrip strength and AMA were higher in post-puberty subjects, followed by puberty and pre-puberty (p<0.05). There was correlation between AMA and handgrip strength in the three maturational stages (pre-puberty: rho=0.49; puberty: rho=0.74, and pos-puberty: rho=0.70. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that handgrip strength is related with muscle mass; however, this relationship is also true in the early maturational stages.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2011-09-30
How to Cite
1.
Santos MM, Ferreira AHS, Costa MC, Guimarães FJS, Ritti-Dias RM. Contributions of muscle mass to force production in different maturation stages. Cons. Saúde [Internet]. 2011 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Sep. 19];10(3):487-93. Available from: https://uninove.emnuvens.com.br/saude/article/view/2901
Issue
Section
Applied Sciences
License
Copyright (c) 2011 ConScientiae Saúde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.