The impact of video game prototyping in an accelerator as viewed via spatial, temporal, and product scales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i3.20745Keywords:
Accelerator, Video games, Ethnography, Incubators, Creative industries.Abstract
Objective of the study: We seek to understand two aspects of a business accelerator: first, how an accelerator influences early product development, and second, how an accelerator impacts participants during and after acceleration.
Methodology/approach: We conducted an ethnography of a rapid prototyping program in video game development. Methods included 810 hours of participant observation, 58 interviews, and hundreds of analyzed material artifacts.
Originality/Relevance: We add insight into the impact and outcomes of an accelerator program across multiple scales: spatial, temporal, and product. Our study is one of the first to examine a formal video game development accelerator.
Main Results: Accelerator participants created 42 prototype games, two companies received additional funding, but no games were released within one year of the program. Product scales changed over time from expectations, to prototypes, to final games. The spatial-temporal scale of the accelerator was open to interpretation. Participants and observers held two main spatial-temporal perspectives (present-local and future-global) that changed over a one year time period.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: First, we conceptualize an accelerator as a dual competitive place where participants and observers engage in dueling and evolving spatial-temporal perspectives over time. Second, we develop the concept of an accelerated digital product scale to explain the process of evolvement from an accelerator product to a potential final product.
Social/Management contributions: We conclude the impact of an accelerator is more complex than the structure or the output. The accelerator may rapidly generate ideas or prototypes, but this does not guarantee a quicker final product release.
Downloads
References
Aurava, R., Meriläinen, M., Kankainen, V. & Stenros, J. (2021). Game jams in general formal education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 28: 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100274
Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Ramos, A., & Guitar, S. (2012). Revisiting incubation performance: How incubator typology affects results. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79: 888-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.003
Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F. & Pessot, E. (2017). Open accelerators for start-ups success: a case study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20: 80-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2015-0113
Bone, J., Gonzalez-Uribe, J. Haley, C., & Lahr, H. (2019). The impact of business accelerators and incubators in the UK. BEIS Research Paper Number 2019/009.
Buffart, M., Croidieu, G., Kim, P. H., & Bowman, R. (2020). Even winners need to learn: How government entrepreneurship programs can support innovative ventures. Research Policy, 49: 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104052
Chatzidakis, A. & Shaw, D. (2018). Sustainability: Issues of scale, care and consumption. British Journal of Management, 29: 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12292
Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32: 104-124. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0133
Cohen, S. (2013). What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8: 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00184
Cohen, S., Bingham, C. B., & Hallen, B. L. (2019). The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64: 810–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218782131
Cohen, S., Fehder, D. C., Hochberg, Y. V., & Murray, F. (2019). The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy, 48: 1781-1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003
Crișan, E. L., Salanță, I. I., Beleiu, I. N., Bordean, O. N., & Bunduchi, R. (2021). A systematic literature review on accelerators. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46: 62–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09754-9
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gaudl, S. E., Nelson, M. J., Colton, S., Saunders, R., Powley, E. J., Ferrer, B. P., Ivey, P. & Cook, M. (2018). Rapid game jams with fluidic games: A user study & design methodology. Entertainment Computing, 27: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.02.007
Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428112452151
Goswami, K., Mitchell, J.R., & Bhagavatula, S. (2018). Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12: 117-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1281
Hallen, B. L., Cohen, S. L. & Bingham, C. B. (2020). Do accelerators work? If so, how? Organization Science, 31: 378–414. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1304
Hochberg, Y. V. (2016). Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: The seed accelerator model. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 16: 25-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/684985
Johns, J. (2006). Video games production networks: Value capture, power relations and embeddedness. Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 151–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi001
Johnson, R. S. (2013). Toward greater production diversity: Examining social boundaries at a video game studio. Games and Culture, 8: 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412013481848
Kennedy, H. W. (2018). Game jam as Feminist methodology: The affective labors of intervention in the Ludic economy. Games and Culture, 13: 708–727. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412018764992
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review, 24: 691-710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
Lehrer, M., Banerjee, P. M., & Wang, I. K. (2017). When the sky is the limit on scale: From temporal to multiplicative scaling in process-based technologies. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 117: 151-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.006
Liu, Y. (2020). The micro-foundations of global business incubation: Stakeholder engagement and strategic entrepreneurial partnerships. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 161: 120294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120294
Locke, K. (2011). Field research practice in management and organization studies: Reclaiming its tradition of discovery. Academy of Management Annals, 5: 613–652. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593319
Lubit, A. J. (2022). A mother’s experience of asylum: Conflicting temporalities, belonging, and evolving care relations. Journal of Intercultural Studies, [In Press]. 43: 464-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2022.2086226
Malek, K., Maine, E. M. A., & McCarthy, I. P. (2014). A typology of clean technology commercialization accelerators. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 32: 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.10.006
Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24: 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200674086272
Mian, S., Lamine, W., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge, Technovation, 50–51: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005
Nieborg, D. B. (2015). Crushing candy: the free-to-play game in its connective commodity form. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115621932
Nguyen, T. T., Phan, H. T. T., & Pham, V. T. (2021). Impact of creativity on student entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Innovation, 9: 646-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005
O'Reilly, D., Allen, S., & Reedy, P. (2018). Reimagining the scales, dimensions and fields of socio-ecological sustainability. British Journal of Management, 29: 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12278
Panourgias, N. S., Nandhakumar, J., & Scarbrough, H. (2014). Entanglements of creative agency and digital technology: A sociomaterial study of computer game development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 83: 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.010
Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50–51: 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
Pottie-Sherman, Y. & Lynch, N. (2019). Gaming on the edge: Mobile labour and global talent in Atlantic Canada's video game industry. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, 63: 425-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12522
Roberts, P. & Lall, S. (2019). Observing acceleration: Uncovering the effects of accelerators on impact-oriented entrepreneurs. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00042-4
Slayton, R. & Spinardi, G. (2016). Radical innovation in scaling up: Boeing’s Dreamliner and the challenge of socio-technical transitions. Technovation, 47: 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.004
Spicer, A. (2006). Beyond the convergence–divergence debate: The role of spatial scales in transforming organizational logic. Organization Studies, 27: 1467–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067515
Taylor, S. & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9: 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00214.x
Whitson, J. R. (2020). What can we learn from studio studies ethnographies?: A “messy” account of game development materiality, learning, and expertise. Games and Culture, 15: 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018783320
Zaheer, S., Albert, S., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Time scales and organizational theory. The Academy of Management Review, 24: 725-741. https://doi.org/10.2307/259351
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Abstract 365
- PDF 297
