Gestão adaptativa de projetos: um levantamento dos artefatos mais utilizados para gerenciar o escopo do projeto

Ivete Rodrigues; Danilo Rabetti

doi:10.5585/gep.v12i1.18632

Authors

Ivete Rodrigues Faculdade FIA de Administração e Negócios
Danilo Rabetti Faculdade FIA de Administração e Negócios

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v12i1.18632

Keywords:

Project management, Agile methodology, Predictive methodology, Project complexity, Adaptive project management, Hybrid project management, Scope project management.

Abstract

The paper objectives are (a) to map the scope management artifacts recommended by predictive and agile methods; (b) verify which of them have been used by project managers and their organizations; and c) identify and analyze the use of the adaptive project management approach according to the project complexity. Based on the literature review, a set of traditional and agile artifacts for project scope management was consolidated. Then, the survey method was used to verify which artifacts are most used by project managers in view of the complexity of the projects. The results showed that the majority of project managers still do not have flexibility in choosing the artifacts used in the projects. Predictive artifacts are the most used, but there are indications that companies are beginning to migrate to an adaptive approach. The study offers an academic contribution to the consolidation of the artifacts available for managing the scope of a project, both in the traditional and in the agile methodologies. It also contributes to analyses the artifacts that are actually in use, in order to better understand how the choice of artifacts is made, regardless of unique methodological approaches. In terms of managerial implications, the results may contribute to the companies' practice, helping them to decide on the use of techniques and artifacts for scope management in both approaches, avoiding using the agile methodologies indiscriminately or remaining rooted in the controls and plans of traditional methodologies.

References

Agile Business Consortium (2014). Agile Project Framework Handbook. Recuperado em 14 de julho, 2019, de: https://www.agilebusiness.org/page/ProjectFramework_00_ welcome.

Alba, J., Cron, D., El Ouarti, M., Pugliese, G., Schmehr, W., Simonelli, L., & Wolstad, J. (2016). IPMA International Certification Regulations. International Project Management Association (IPMA).

Appelo, J. (2011). Management 3.0: leading agile developers, developing agile leaders. Boston: Pearson Education.

AXELOS. (2018). What is PRINCE2? Recuperado 9 de abril de 2018, de https://www.prince2.com/usa/what-is-prince2

Babbie, E. R. (1999). Métodos de pesquisa de survey. Belo Horizonte, UFMG.

Batra, D.; Xia, W.; Vandermeer, D. & Dutta, K (2010). Balancing agile and structured development approaches to successfully manage large distributed software projects: a case study from the cruise line industry. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS), Vol. 27, Article 21.

Beck, K, Beedle., Bennekum, A. Van, Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, C., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J. (2001). Manifesto para Desenvolvimento Ágil de Software. Recuperado 22 de março de 2018 de 2001 de website: http://agilemanifesto.org/iso/ptbr/manifesto.html.

Conforto, E. C. & Amaral, D. C. (2007) Escritório de Projetos e Gerenciamento Ágil: um novo enfoque para a estrutura de apoio à gestão de Projetos Ágeis. Anais. XXVII Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção (Enegep). Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brasil.

Conforto, E. C. & Amaral, D.C. (2008). Evaluating an Agile Method for Planning and Controlling Innovative Projects. Project Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2, p. 73–80.

Cooper, R. G. & Sommer, A. F. (2016) Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity. v. 33, n. 5, pp. 513–526.

Cooper, R. G. & Sommer, A. F. (2020). New-Product Portfolio Management with Agile. Research-Technology Management, 63(1): 29–38.

Dao, B., Kermanshachi, S., Shane, J., Anderson, S., & Hare, E. (2016). Identifying and Measuring Project Complexity [Eletronic version]. Procedia Engineering, 145, 476–482.

Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operations management: A process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, v. 22, n. 2, pp. 152–194, 2002.

Global Alliance for the Project Professions (2007). A framework for performance based competency standards for global level 1 and 2 project managers. Global Alliance for Project Performance Standards.

Geraldi, J.; Maylor, H. & Williams, T. (2011) General rights Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. Recuperado em 22 de setembro, 2019, de https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111165848

Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2005). Análise Multivariada de Dados. (5. ed.). Bookman.

Highsmith, J. (2012). Gerenciamento Ágil de Projetos: Criando Produtos Inovadores. 2. ed. ed. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Alta Books.

Hollingsworth, C. (2011). What kanban can do. PM Network, 25(3), 66–67.

Kerzner, H. (2013). Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. 2. ed. ed. Hoboken: Wiley.

Leach, L. P. (2005). Lean project management: eight principles for success. Boise, Idaho: Advanced-projects.

Maximiano A. C. A. (2007). Administração de projetos: como transformar ideias em resultados. 2ª. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

Papadakis, E. & Tsironis, L. K. (2020) Towards a Hybrid Project Management Framework: A Systematic Literature Review on Traditional, Agile and Hybrid Techniques. Journal of Modern Project Management, [s. l.], v. 08, n. 2, p. 124–139.

PMI (2014). Navigating complexity: a practice guide. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute (PMI).

PMI (2017a). Guia do Conhecimento em Gerenciamento de Projetos. 6. ed. ed. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute (PMI).

PMI (2017b). Guia Ágil. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute (PMI).

Poveda-Bautista, R., Diego-Mas, J. A., & Leon-Medina, D. (2018). Measuring the Project Management Complexity: The Case of Information Technology Projects. Complexity [Eletronic Version], 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6058480.

Sampieri, R. H., Collado C. F. & Lucio, M. D. P. B. (2013). Metodologia de Pesquisa. Porto Alegre: Penso.

Sauer, S. (2017). Agile Project Management as a generator of stress relief and efficiency? International Journal of Strategic Management, v. 17, n. 2, p. 67–74.

Schwaber, K. & Sutherland, J. (2017) Scrum Guides Downloads. Recuperado em Disponível em 21 de novembro, 2019, de: <http://www.scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide /v2017/2017-Scrum-Guide-Portuguese-Brazilian.pdf>.

Shenhar, A. J., Milosevic, D., Dvir, D., & Thamhain, H. (2007). Linking Project Management to Business Strategy. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute (PMI).

Shenhar, A. J. (2001) One size does not fit all projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains. Management Science, v. 47, n. 3, p. 394–414.

Shenhar, A. J. & Dvir, D. (2010) Reinventando gerenciamento de projetos: a abordagem diamante ao crescimento e inovação bem-sucedidos. São Paulo: M.Books.

Souza Pinto, J., Novaski, O., Anholon, R., & Carpim Besteiro, É. N. (2014). Proposta de Método de Mensuração da Complexidade em Projetos [Versão eletrônica]. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, 5(3), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v5i3.280.

Spundak, M. (2014). Mixed agile/traditional project management methodology – reality or illusion? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. No. 119, pp. 939-948.

Valeriano, D. L. (2001). Gerenciamento estratégico e administração por projetos. Makron Books. São Paulo, SP.

Valle, A. B., Soares, C. A. P., Finocchio Jr., J & Silva, L. S. F. (2010). Fundamentos do gerenciamento de projetos (2a ed.). Editora FGV.

Vidal, L. A.; Marle, F. & Bocquet, J. C. (2011) Measuring project complexity using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Project Management, v. 29, n. 6, p. 718–727.

Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective project management: traditional, agile, extreme. 7. ed. ed. New Delhi: Wiley.

Yugue, R. T. & Maximiano, A. C. A. (2013). Entendendo e gerenciando a complexidade de projetos. Revista de Gestão e Projetos - GeP, São Paulo, v. 4, n. 1, p 01-22, jan./abr.

Zasa, A. P. & Pellizzoni, E; (2021). Managing the Hybrid Organization: How Can Agile and Traditional Project Management Coexist? Research-Technology Management, January-February.