Study comparing optimization methods for problems with multiple responses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.v16n3.7508Keywords:
Optimization, Multiple-response, Meta-heuristic, Simulated annealing, Desirability.Abstract
This work aims to evaluate the performance of two agglutinating functions, Desirability and, Modified Desirability, performed with two search methods, the Generalized Reduced Gradient and, the meta-Heuristic Simulated Annealing. The performance of methods was assessed by the Absolute Distance and the Mean of Deviation Percentage. For the optimization methods implementation were selected three multiple-response cases from the literature. The results of methods assessment show a better performance for the modified Desireability function, regardless of the search method for the multiple-response optimization, especially when these responses are modeled by equations within quadratic terms, regardless of: the number of terms; the types of responses; and, the number of variables. The methods and the results presented in this paper aim to collaborate with the research, development and assessment of advanced techniques for multi-response optimization in order to increase the performance of industrial processes.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2018-09-27
How to Cite
Gomes, F. M., Pereira, F. M., Marins, F. A. S., & Silva, M. B. (2018). Study comparing optimization methods for problems with multiple responses. Exacta, 16(3), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.v16n3.7508
Issue
Section
Papers