Revisão sistemática da literatura sobre a relação entre inovação e desempenho financeiro das startups

Luciana Santos Costa Vieira da Silva; Fabíola Kaczam; Deoclécio Júnior Cardoso da Silva; Bruno Nogueira Silva; Wenner Gláucio Lopes Lucena

doi:10.5585/exactaep.2022.20997

Authors

Luciana Santos Costa Vieira da Silva Universidade Federal da Paraíba / João Pessoa, Paraíba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9538-7150
Fabíola Kaczam Universidade Federal de Santa Maria / Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0460-9927
Deoclécio Júnior Cardoso da Silva Universidade Federal de Santa Maria / Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2395-2878
Bruno Nogueira Silva Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido / Mossoró - RN https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9991-4595
Wenner Gláucio Lopes Lucena Universidade Federal da Paraíba / João Pessoa, Paraíba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2476-7383

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/exactaep.2022.20997

Keywords:

innovation, startups, performance, systematic literature review

Abstract

The aim of this article is to develop a Systematic Literature Review (RSL) on the relationship between innovation and financial performance in Startups. Forty-nine articles were selected from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The analyzes were supported by the three laws of classical bibliometrics. The period from 2011 to 2020 was defined for the preparation of this study. There is a need for startups to adopt an organizational culture that adopts innovative practices and guides the internal environment in the adoption of innovative behaviors, as well as strengthening relationships between universities, incubators and funding sources with the formation of strong alliances to promote innovation in addition to greater maturation in cooperation networks between companies. The contribution consists of offering evidence on the results of the studies, which can support the decision-making of startup managers and public managers, in the creation of strategies and policies oriented towards competitiveness, such as, for example, the strengthening of relations between companies and universities and the expansion of cooperation networks, as found in the analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luciana Santos Costa Vieira da Silva, Universidade Federal da Paraíba / João Pessoa, Paraíba

Doutora em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina e Pós-Doutoranda no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Contabilidade da Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Mestra em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina,

Fabíola Kaczam, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria / Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul

Mestra em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria e Doutoranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da UFSM.

Deoclécio Júnior Cardoso da Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria / Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul

Mestre em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria e Doutorando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da UFSM.

Bruno Nogueira Silva, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido / Mossoró - RN

Mestrando do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da UFERSA

Wenner Gláucio Lopes Lucena, Universidade Federal da Paraíba / João Pessoa, Paraíba

Doutor em Ciências Contábeis pelo Programa Multiinstitucional e Inter-Regional de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Contábeis e Professor do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Contábeis da UFPB.

References

ABSTARTUPS. Associação Brasileira de Startups. (2018). << https://abstartups.com.br/definicao-startups/>>. Acesso em: junho de 2021.

AGARWAL, R., & SHAH, S. K. (2014). Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Research Policy, 43(7), 1109-1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.012

ALI, A. (1994). Pioneering versus incremental innovation: Review and research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 11, n. 1, p. 46–61, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1110046

ALONSO, D., GONZÁLEZ, N., & NIETO, M. effect on entrepreneurship?”, Journal of International Entrepreneurship (en prensa).

BEYHAN YASAR, N., SEZEN, B., & KARAKADILAR, I. S. (2019). Mediating effect of continuous improvement on the relationship between innovation and financial performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(7-8), 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1353415

BIOLCHINI, J., MIAN, P. G., NATALI, A. C. C., & TRAVASSOS, G. H. (2005). Systematic review in software engineering. System Engineering and Computer Science Department COPPE/UFRJ, Technical Report ES, 679(05), 45.

BOLIVAR-RAMOS, M.T., GARCIA-MORALES, V.J. AND GARCIA-SANCHEZ, E. (2012). “Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 331-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.006.

BORDONS, M., & GÓMEZ, I. (2000). Collaboration networks in science. The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield, 197-213.

CACCIOLATTI, L., ROSLI, A., RUIZ-ALBA, J. L., & CHANG, J. (2020). Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission. Journal of Business Research, 106, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.047

CHAMMASSIAN, R. G., & SABATIER, V. (2020). The role of costs in business model design for early-stage technology startups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120090

CHO, MEEHEE; BONN, MARK A.; HAN, SU JIN. (2019). Innovation ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for startup and established restaurants and impacts upon performance. Industry And Innovation, [S.L.], v. 27, n. 4, p. 340-362, 4 jul. Informa UK Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1633280.

CHOI, E. & LEE, K. C. (2016). Relação entre a dinâmica da estrutura da rede social e a inovação: análises em nível micro de equipes multifuncionais virtuais em uma empresa multinacional B2B. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 65, p.151-162, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.021

CLAUSS, T. et al. (2019). Strategic Agility, Business Model Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, p. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2910381

COLOMBO, M. G., & PIVA, E. (2012). Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 41(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.010

COLOMBO, M. G., DOGANOVA, L., PIVA, E., D’ADDA, D., & MUSTAR, P. (2015). Hybrid alliances and radical innovation: the performance implications of integrating exploration and exploitation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(4), 696-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9363-x

DAMANPOUR, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996-1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x

DE GODOI, T. X., MENOLLI, A., & DIONÍSIO, G. M. (2019). Software Startups Success Factors Study under the Entrepreneurial Perspective Estudo sobre os Fatores de Sucesso de Startups de Software sob a Perspectiva Empreendedora. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330204.3330263

DE GROOTE, J. K., & BACKMANN, J. (2020). Initiating open innovation collaborations between incumbents and startups: How can David and Goliath get along?. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(02), 2050011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500115

DE-LA-TORRE-UGARTE-GUANILO, M. C.; TAKAHASHI, R. F.; BERTOLOZZI, M. R. (2011). Revisão sistemática: noções gerais. Rev. esc. enferm. USP [online]. vol.45, n.5, pp.1260-1266. ISSN 0080-6234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342011000500033.

ETZKOWITZ, H. & LEYDESDORFF, L. (1995). The triple helix–university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1): 14–19. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085

ETZKOWITZ, H. & LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘‘mode 2’’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29:109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

ETZKOWITZ, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research policy, 27(8), 823-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6

FERRIANI, S.; GARNSEY, E. & LORENZONI, G. (2012). Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: the process of reimprinting. Industrial And Corporate Change, [S.L.], v. 21, n. 4, p. 1011-1048, 8 mar. Oxford University Press (OUP). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts001.

GÖK, O., & PEKER, S. (2017). Understanding the links among innovation performance, market performance and financial performance. Review of Managerial Science, 11(3), 605-631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0198-8.

GREVE, H. R.; TAYLOR, A. Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 45, n. 1, p. 54–80, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2666979

HOJNIK, J. & RUZZIER, M. (2016). The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its impact on performance: insights from Slovenia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13:812-825, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.002.

HUTAHAYAN, B. (2020). The mediating role of human capital and management accounting information system in the relationship between innovation strategy and internal process performance and the impact on corporate financial performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2018-0034.

JEONG, J., KIM, J., SON, H., & NAM, D. I. (2020). The role of venture capital investment in startups’ sustainable growth and performance: Focusing on absorptive capacity and venture capitalists’ reputation. Sustainability, 12(8), 3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083447.

JIMÉNEZ-JIMÉNEZ, D., & SANZ-VALLE, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of business research, 64(4), 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010

KATZ, J. S., & MARTIN, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration?. Research policy, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.

KITCHENHAM, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26. ISSN: 1353-7776

KLUGE, J., MEFFERT, J., & STEIN, L. (2000). The German road to innovation. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2(1), 99-105.

KOHLER, T. (2016). Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups. Business Horizons, 59(3), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/jbushor.2016.01.008.

KORPER, A. K., PATRÍCIO, L., HOLMLID, S., & WITELL, L. (2020). Service design as an innovation approach in technology startups: a longitudinal multiple case study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(2), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12383

KRETSCHMER, H., LIMING, L., & KUNDRA, R. (2001). Chinese-Indian-German collaboration results that provided the impetus for the foundation of COLLNET. Scientometrics, 52(3), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014247900224.

KUCKERTZ, A., BRÄNDLE, L., GAUDIG, A., HINDERER, S., REYES, C. A. M., PROCHOTTA, A., ... & BERGER, E. S. (2020). Startups in times of crisis–A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169

LIMA, R. A. D., VELHO, L. M. L. S., & FARIA, L. I. L. D. (2007). Indicadores bibliométricos de cooperação científica internacional em bioprospecção. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 12, 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-99362007000100005.

MAI, A. N. et al. The lasting effects of innovation on firm profitability: panel evidence from a transitional economy, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, v. 32, n. 1, p. 3417-3436, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1660199.

Management, 59, 39– 47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2016.1117329.

MANGIZA, P., & BROWN, I. (2020, September). Requisite Skills Profile of Software Development Professionals for Startups. In Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2020 (pp. 102-109). https://doi.org/10.1145/3410886.3410904.

MEADOWS, C. (1999, May). Analysis of the Internet Key Exchange protocol using the NRL protocol analyzer. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No. 99CB36344) (pp. 216-231). IEEE. Https://doi.org/10.1109/SECPRI.1999.766916

MITTAL, T., & MADAN, P. (2020). Impact of financing patterns on business performance of e-startups in India: a research model. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 21(4), 490-508. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2020.105983

NG, W. K. B., APPEL-MEULENBROEK, R., CLOODT, M., & ARENTZE, T. (2019). Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology

study on science parks in Europe. Research Policy, 48(3), 719-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.004

NICOTRA, M., ROMANO, M., CASTROGIOVANNI, A., & CORRENTE, S. (2020). Startups, Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context Using SMAA-S. In The Entrepreneurial Behaviour: Unveiling the cognitive and emotional aspect of entrepreneurship. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-507-920201008.

NORUZY A, DALFARD VM, AZHDARI B, NAZARI-SHIRKOUHI S, REZAZADEH A (2013) Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(5–8):1073–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4038-y.

OECD., Development (Paris)., Development. Development Centre, Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (Paris), Statistical Office of the European COMMUNITIES, & SOCIETY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT. (2005).

Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (No. 4). Org. for Economic Cooperation & Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264213081-zh.

PARK, S. (2016). Differences in technology innovation R&D performance creation behavior between for‑profit institutions and not‑for‑profit institutions. Park Springer Plus, 5:451, p. 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2092-x.

PIENING, E. P., & SALGE, T. O. (2015). Understanding the antecedents, contingencies, and performance implications of process innovation: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12225.

RIES, E. (2012). A Startup Enxuta. São Paulo: Leya, 275p.

ROTHAERMEL, F. T., & THURSBY, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages. Research policy, 34(7), 1076-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.012

SMALL, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

STECK, P. E. & GEENHUIZEN, M. S. VAN. (2016). The influence of international research interaction on national innovation performance: a bibliometric approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 110: 61–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.017

TRANFIELD, D., DENYER, D. & SMART, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14: 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.

TSAI, K. H. AND YANG, S. Y. (2014). “The contingent value of firm innovativeness for businessperformance under environmental turbulence”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 343-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0225-4.

VAN ECK, N. J., & WALTMAN, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285-320). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13

WALTER, A., PARBOTEEAH, K. P., RIESENHUBER, F., & HOEGL, M. (2011). Championship behaviors and innovations success: An empirical investigation of university spin‐offs. Journal of product innovation management, 28(4), 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00826.x

WANG, Z., HE, Q., XIA, S., SARPONG, D., XIONG, A., & MAAS, G. (2020). Capacities of business incubator and regional innovation performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120125

WILSON, G. A., & SLOBODZIAN, A. D. (2019). Enhancing financial performance by pharmacy innovation. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 37(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1562

WINTER, S. G. (2006). Toward a neo-Schumpeterian theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj006.

YILDIZ, S., & KARAKAS, A. (2012). Defining methods and criteria for measuring business performance: A comparative research between the literature in Turkey and foreign. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1091-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1090.

ZHANG, Y. et al. (2020). Effects of firm, industry, and country-level innovation on firm performance. Marketing Letters, v. 31, p. 231-245, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09530-y

ZIZLAVSKY, O. (2016). Innovation performance measurement: research into Czech business practice. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 816-838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1235983

ZULU-CHISANGA, S., BOSO, N., ADEOLA, O., & OGHAZI, P. (2016). Investigating the path from firm innovativeness to financial performance: The roles of new product success, market responsiveness, and environment turbulence. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 26(1), 51-68.