Adoção das normas ISO 56002 e ISO 14006 para transferência de tecnologia de inovações sustentáveis: um estudo exploratório sobre o designer

Bertiene Maria Lack Barboza; Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli; João Luiz Kovaleski

doi:10.5585/iptec.v10i2.22027

Autores

Bertiene Maria Lack Barboza Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná – UTFPR. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-3903
Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná – UTFPR. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-406X
João Luiz Kovaleski Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná – UTFPR. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4232-8883

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/iptec.v10i2.22027

Palavras-chave:

ISO 56002, ISO 14006, Gestão da inovação, Transferência de tecnologia, Eco design.

Resumo

O trabalho dispõe contextualizar os sistemas de gestão padronizados da ISO 56002 para gestão da inovação e a ISO 14006 no âmbito do ecodesign para a gestão ambiental, propor um framework para inovações sustentáveis, e analisar o perfil do designer para a transferência de tecnologia. Foi realizado uma revisão da literatura por meio do Methodi Ordinatio, o qual permitiu embasar a fundamentação teórica sobre a temática. Com base na análise abrangente das pesquisas voltadas ao desenvolvimento sustentável e inovação ficou evidenciado a interação entre os temas, e sua relação por meios de regulamentações ambientais, desempenho e competitividade. O trabalho ressaltou o uso do conhecimento para incorporar diferentes metodologias e ferramentas de gestão com uma abordagem comum, globalmente aceita pelas normas ISO, a fim de aumentar o nível de produtividade, mantendo um nível de competição das organizações. E, por fim, trouxe as características que as normas ISO colaboram para um designer ser capaz de transferir as inovações sustentáveis.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Barboza, B. M. L., Kovaleski, J. L., De Genaro Chiroli, D. M.; Souza, F. (2019) Práticas de Inovação e Desenvolvimento Sustentável: uma revisão sistemática. Revista Debates Sobre Innovación, (3), 1-14.

Baumann, H., Boons, F., & Bragd, A. (2002). Mapping The Green Product Development Field. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 409–425.

Brones, F., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2015). From 50 to 1: integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96(SI), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.036

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86 (6):84–92.

Cerezo-Narváez, A., García-Jurado, D., González-Cruz, M. C., Pastor-Fernández, A., Otero-Mateo, M., & Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2019). Standardizing innovation management: An opportunity for SMEs in the aerospace industry. Processes, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7050282

Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.006

Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., & Benhida, K. (2016). The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.101

Corsi, A., Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Luiz da Silva, V. (2020). Technology transfer for sustainable development: Social impacts depicted and some other answers to a few questions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118522

Corsi, A., Barboza, B. M. L., Pagani, R. N., De Genaro Chiroli, D. M., & Kovaleski, J. L. (2021). Technology transfer oriented to sustainable development: Barriers and opportunities. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 20(02), 2150015.

Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886

De Giorgi, C., Dal Palù, D., & Allione, C. (2015). Development and results of a cross border network project, aimed at the engineering of eco-compatible products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.078

Dziallas, M., & Blind, K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation, 80–81, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005

Elkington, J., (1997). Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century. Capstone, Oxford, UK. ISBN: 1-900961-27-X

El-Kassar, A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016

Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C., & Ratten, V. (2018). Environmental-related patent technology transfer effectiveness. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-10-2017-0079

García‐Quevedo, J., Kesidou, E., & Martínez‐Ros, E. (2020). Driving sectoral sustainability via the diffusion of organizational eco‐innovations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1437-1447.

Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J.A. and Urbano, D. (2015), “Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: an exploratory study of the United Kingdom”, Research Policy, 44(3), 748-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.008

Hallstedt, S. I. (2017). Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068

Hamdoun, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Ben Othman, H. (2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.031

Harrington, H. J., Voehl, F. (2019). The Innovation Systems Cycle. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324727

Hernández, R. J., Cooper, R., Tether, B., & Murphy, E. (2018). Design, the Language of Innovation: A Review of the Design Studies Literature. She Ji, 4(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.001

ISO 14001. (2015). Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use. Accessed: https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html

ISO 56002. (2019). Innovation Management System. Accessed: https://www.iso.org/standard/68221.html.

ISO 14006 (2020). Environmental management systems -Guidelines for incorporating ecodesign. Acessed: https://www.iso.org/standard/72644.html

ISO (2020). Accessed: https://www.iso.org/about-us.html

Jiang, P., Fu, X., Van Fan, Y., Klemeš, J. J., Chen, P., Ma, S., & Zhang, W. (2020). Spatial-Temporal Potential Exposure Risk Analytics and Urban Sustainability Impacts related to COVID-19 Mitigation: A Perspective from Car Mobility Behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123673

Johnson, M. P. (2015). Sustainability Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Managers’ Awareness and Implementation of Innovative Tools. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(5), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1343

Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., & Johl, S. K. (2021). Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2922-2936.

Loorbach, D., & Wijsman, K. (2013). Business transition management: exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions. Journal of cleaner production, 45, 20-28.

Martínez-Costa, M., Jimenez-Jimenez, D., Castro-del-Rosario, Y. P. (2019). The performance implications of the UNE 166.000 standardised innovation management system. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0028

Manders, B., de Vries, H. J., & Blind, K. (2016). ISO 9001 and product innovation: A literature review and research framework. Technovation, 48–49, 41–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.004

Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2017). Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers’ perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004

Mir, M, Casadesús, M., Petnji, L. H. (2016). The impact of standardized innovation management systems on innovation capability and business performance: An empirical study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 41, 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.06.002

Moura, E., Bruno Rocha e Cruz, T., & De Genaro Chiroli, D. M. (2020). A framework proposal to integrate humanitarian logistics practices, disaster management and disaster mutual assistance: A Brazilian case. Safety Science, 132(August), 104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104965

Navajas, A., Uriarte, L., & Gandia, L. M. (2017). Application of Eco-Design and Life Cycle Assessment Standards for Environmental Impact Reduction of an Industrial Product. Sustainability, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101724

Nidumolu, R, Prahalad C., Rangaswami M. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review ,87: 56–64.

OECD/Eurostat (2018), Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

Pagani, R.N., Kovaleski, J.L., Resende, L.M., (2015). Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication, Scientometrics. 105(3), 2109-2135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1744-x

Porter, M. E. and van der Linde, C., 1995a. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate, Harvard Business Review, 73 (5), 120–134.

Ramanathan, R., He, Q., Black, A., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2017). Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.116

Roos, G. (2016). Design-Based Innovation for Manufacturing Firm Success in High-Cost Operating Environments. She Ji, 2(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.03.001

Santolaria, M., Oliver-Sol, J., Gasol, C. M., Morales-Pinzón, T., & Rieradevall, J. (2011). Eco-design in innovation driven companies: Perception, predictions and the main drivers of integration. the Spanish example. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(12), 1315–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.009

Schöggl, J. P., Baumgartner, R. J., & Hofer, D. (2017). Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1602–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195

Soare, I., Rusu, M., & Militaru, C. (2019). Model for self-assessment of an organization’s ability to achieve sustained success. INCAS Bulletin, 11(3), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.3.20

van Vuuren, D. P., Kok, M., Lucas, P. L., Prins, A. G., Alkemade, R., van den Berg, M., ... & Stehfest, E. (2015). Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 303-323.

WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Acessed: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf