Projetos de pesquisa e desenvolvimento relacionados à adoção de inteligência artificial na cadeia de suprimentos

Priscila Rezende da Costa; Adriana de Castro Pires

doi:10.5585/gep.v15i2.26210

Autores

Priscila Rezende da Costa Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7012-0679
Adriana de Castro Pires Universidade Nove de Julho – Uninove https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-4846

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v15i2.26210

Palavras-chave:

Projetos de P&D, Adoção de Inteligência Artificial, Cadeia de Suprimentos, Cooperação Tecnológica, Fluxos de Conhecimento

Resumo

Este artigo tem como objetivo investigar os determinantes do esforço de inovação das organizações responsáveis por projetos de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento (P&D), relacionados à adoção de Inteligência Artificial (IA) na Cadeia de Suprimentos (CS) (P&D-IA-CS). Para isso, foram analisadas 4.698 patentes e famílias de patentes como proxys para projetos de P&D-IA-CS bem-sucedidos. As principais organizações responsáveis por projetos de P&D-IA-CS foram multinacionais, especialmente norte-americanas e europeias, com forte domínio tecnológico e cooperação. Descobriu-se que as organizações responsáveis por projetos de P&D-IA-CS mais relevantes são aquelas de natureza tecnológica, com fortes laços com universidades e institutos de pesquisa. Além disso, este estudo constatou que o esforço de inovação de tais organizações é impulsionado positivamente pela cooperação tecnológica, pelo impacto da tecnologia no domínio técnico e pela importância estratégica da tecnologia para as entidades. Por outro lado, os fluxos de conhecimento, tanto patentários quanto científicos, exerceram uma influência negativa sobre o esforço de inovação, indicando que as organizações responsáveis por projetos de P&D-IA-CS tendem a desenvolver tecnologias menos baseadas em conhecimento prévio, priorizando a criação de conhecimento novo para obterem vantagem competitiva e distinção tecnológica.

Biografia do Autor

Priscila Rezende da Costa, Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove

Doutora em Administração pela Universidade de São Paulo, FEA USP, 2012. Mestre em Administração pela Universidade de São Paulo, FEA RP USP, 2007. Graduada em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Lavras, UFLA, 2005. Atualmente é diretora do Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração da Universidade Nove de Julho, PPGA UNINOVE. É bolsista produtividade em pesquisa, CNPq - PQ 2, e professora dos cursos de Mestrado e Doutorado em Administração, Linha de Inovação, Empreendedorismo e Negócios Sustentáveis (IEN). Também na UNINOVE é professora do curso de Graduação em Administração, preside o Comitê Local de Acompanhamento e Avaliação (CLAA) do Programa de Educação Tutorial (PET) e atua na coordenação técnica e acadêmica do Programa Escola da Ciência e do Simpósio Internacional de Gestão de Projetos, Inovação e Sustentabilidade (SINGEP). Foi Coordenadora do Curso de Graduação em Administração da UNINOVE, 2010-2014. É editora chefe do International Journal of Innovation (IJI) e editora associada do Innovation & Management Review (IMR). É líder de Grupo de Pesquisa do CNPq, intitulado Estratégia de Inovação, e no âmbito do grupo coordenou projetos de pesquisa financiados pelo CNPq (Projeto CNPq Universal n° 422922/2018-8 e Projeto CNPq Ciências Sociais n° 471875/2014-7) e pela FAPESP (RTI 2019/20222-4). Também participa dos seguintes grupos de pesquisa do CNPq: Inovação e Sustentabilidade (UNINOVE); Núcleo de Estudos da Inovação e Competitividade (NEIC/FEI); e Núcleo de Pesquisas em Inovação, Gestão Empreendedora e Competitividade (INGTEC/USP), atuando no Projeto FAPESP n° 2017/25364-6. Tem experiência na área de Administração e seus principais temas de pesquisa são: capacidades dinâmicas, capacidade relacional, capacidade absortiva, cooperação empresa-universidade-governo, internacionalização da inovação, ecossistemas empreendedores, redes e rotas tecnológicas. Mãe do Gael, esteve de licença maternidade de 08/2021 até 01/2022.

Adriana de Castro Pires, Universidade Nove de Julho – Uninove

Doutoranda PPGA UNINOVE

Referências

Abulrub, A. H. G., & Lee, J. (2012). Open innovation management: challenges and prospects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 130-138.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.

Barberá-Tomás, D., Jiménez-Sáez, F., & Castelló-Molina, I. (2011). Mapping the importance of the real world: The validity of connectivity analysis of patent citations networks. Research policy, 40(3), 473-486.

Baryannis, G., Validi, S., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2019). Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2179-2202.

Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292-312.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2006). Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies. Review of Industrial Organization, 28(4), 401-426.

Bishop, K., D’Este, P., & Neely, A. (2011). Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 40(1), 30–40.

Borges, A. F. S., Laurindo, F. J. B., Spínola, M. M., Gonçalves, R. F., & Mattos, C. A. (2020). The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 102–225.

Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of economic geography, 9(4), 439-468.

Canhoto, A. I., & Clear, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence and machine learning as business tools: A framework for diagnosing value destruction potential. Bus. Horiz. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 63, 183–193.

Cerka, ˇ P., Grigiene, ˙ J., & Sirbikyte, ˙ G. (2015). Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence. Computer Law & Security Review, 31, 376–389.

Chen, C., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2), 199-211.

Chen, L. (2017). Do patent citations indicate knowledge linkage? The evidence from text similarities between patents and their citations. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 63-79.

Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open innovation: Where we've been and where we're going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4), 20-27.

Chui, M., Henke, N., Miremadi, M., 2019. Most of AI’s Business Uses Will Be in Two

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

De Fuentes, C., & Dutre´nit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666–1682.

Dirican, C. (2015). The impacts of robotics, artificial intelligence on business and economics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 564–573.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, 11(3), 147-162.

Drejer, I., & Jørgensen, B. H. (2005). The dynamic creation of knowledge: Analysing public–private collaborations. Technovation, 25(2), 83-94.

Du, J., Leten, B., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 828–840.

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Bryde, D. J., Giannakis, M., Foropon, C., … Hazen, B. T. (2020). Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, Article 107599.

Duysters, G., & Lokshin, B. (2011). Determinants of alliance portfolio complexity and its effect on innovative performance of companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 570-585.

Érdi, P., Makovi, K., Somogyvári, Z., Strandburg, K., Tobochnik, J., Volf, P., & Zalányi, L. (2013). Prediction of emerging technologies based on analysis of the US patent citation network. Scientometrics, 95(1), 225-242.

Fornahl, D., Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2011). What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location. Papers in regional science, 90(2), 395-418.

Gao, X., Guan, J., & Rousseau, R. (2011). Mapping collaborative knowledge production in China using patent co-inventorships. Scientometrics, 88(2), 343–362.

George, G., Zahra, S. A., & Wood, D. R. (2002). The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 577–609.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman editora.

Hall, B. H., & Khan, B. (2003). Adoption of new technology (No. w9730). National bureau of economic research.

Huin, S. F., Luong, L. H. S., & Abhary, K. (2003). Knowledge-based tool for planning of enterprise resources in ASEAN SMEs. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19, 409–414.

Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61, 577–586.

Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International journal of production research, 58(10), 2904-2915.

Ji, J., Barnett, G. A., & Chu, J. (2019). Global networks of genetically modified crops technology: a patent citation network analysis. Scientometrics, 118(3), 737-762.

Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M., 2019. Siri, Siri, in my hand: who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Bus. Horiz. 62, 15–25

Kumar, A., Mani, V., Jain, V., Gupta, H., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2023). Managing healthcare supply chain through artificial intelligence (AI): A study of critical success factors. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 175, 108815.

Kumar, V., Ramachandran, D., & Kumar, B. (2020). Influence of new-age technologies on marketing: A research agenda. Journal of Business Research.

Li, R., Chambers, T., Ding, Y., Zhang, G., & Meng, L. (2014). Patent citation analysis: Calculating science linkage based on citing motivation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 1007-1017.

Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development and policy. The World Bank.

Liu, H., Yao, M., & Cao, J. (2020). Linking R&D Project Characteristics to Innovation Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Journal of Business Research.

Maggioni, M. A., Nosvelli, M., & Uberti, T. E. (2007). Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 471-493.

Manyika, J., Bughin, J., 2018. The Promise and Challenge of the Age of Artificial Intelligence. McKinsey Global Institute.

Martin, B. R. (2012). Are universities and university research under threat? Towards an evolutionary model of university speciation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3), 543–565.

Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N.W., Smith, C.D., Zacharia, Z.G., 2001. Defining supply chain management. J. Bus. Logist. 22, 1–25.

Mitze, T., & Strotebeck, F. (2019). Determining factors of interregional research collaboration in Germany's biotech network: Capacity, proximity, policy? Technovation, 80, 40-53.

Mocan, N. H., & Yu, H. (2021). Does Public Funding of Private R&D Generate Economic Value? Evidence from the Small Business Innovation Research Program. Journal of Applied Econometrics.

Nelson, R. R. (2009). An evolutionary theory of economic change. harvard university press.

Ni, D., Xiao, Z., & Lim, M. K. (2020). A systematic review of the research trends of machine learning in supply chain management. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 11, 1463–1482.

Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6-7), 367-377.

Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., & Corbett, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 53, Article 102104

Okuyama, R., & Osada, H. (2013, July). University-industry collaboration in drug discovery in Japan: An empirical analysis over thirty years. In 2013 Proceedings of PICMET'13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET) (pp. 2704-2710). IEEE.

Organização das Nações Unidas – ONU (2020). World Economic Situation and Prospects 2020 (un.org). Disponível em: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/WESP2020_Annex.pdf . Acesso em fevereiro de 2021.

Park, H. W., & Suh, S. H. (2013). Scientific and technological knowledge flow and technological innovation: Quantitative approach using patent citation. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(1), 153–169.

Paulo, A. F., Ribeiro, E. M. S., & Porto, G. S. (2018). Mapping countries cooperation networks in photovoltaic technology development based on patent analysis. Scientometrics, 117(2), 667-686.

Petroni, G., Venturini, K., & Verbano, C. (2012). Open innovation and new issues in R&D organization and personnel management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(1), 147-173.

Pournader, M., Ghaderi, H., Hassanzadegan, A., & Fahimnia, B. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 241, 108250.

Riahi, Y., Saikouk, T., Gunasekaran, A., & Badraoui, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain: A descriptive bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Expert Systems with Applications, 173, 114702.

Richey Jr, R. G., Chowdhury, S., Davis‐Sramek, B., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research. Journal of Business Logistics, 44(4), 532-549.

Samuel, S., Heilweil, R., Piper, K., 2019. The Rapid Development of AI Has Benefits — and Poses Serious Risks.

Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions. Research policy, 31(7), 1163-1180.

Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2009). Spatial interaction modelling of cross‐region R&D collaborations: empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3), 531-546.

Schutzer, D. (1990). Business expert systems: The competitive edge. Expert Systems with Applications, 1, 17–21.

Shih, M. J., & Liu, D. R. (2010). Patent Classification Using Ontology-Based Patent Network Analysis. In PACIS (p. 95).

Shu, X., Xiang, P., & Zhang, L. (2020). Patents, R&D, and Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Chinese High-Tech Firms. Industrial Marketing Management.

Soni, N., Sharma, E. K., Singh, N., & Kapoor, A. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Business: From Research and Innovation to Market Deployment. Procedia Comput. Sci. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Data Science, 167, 2200–2210.

Toorajipour, R., Sohrabpour, V., Nazarpour, A., Oghazi, P., & Fischl, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 122, 502-517.

Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J. F., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities. Journal of business research, 70, 356-365.

Wang, X., Zhang, X., & Xu, S. (2011). Patent co-citation networks of Fortune 500 companies. Scientometrics, 88(3), 761-770.

Weng, C., & Daim, T. U. (2012). Structural differentiation and its implications—core/periphery structure of the technological network. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 327-342.

Yeh, H.Y., Sung, Y.S., Yang, H.W., Tsai W.C., Chen D.Z., (2013). The bibliographic coupling approach to filter the cited and uncited patent citations: A case of electric vehicle technology. Scientometrics, 94(1), 75–93.

Zhang, G., & Tang, C. (2018). How R&D partner diversity influences innovation performance: An empirical study in the nano-biopharmaceutical field. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1487-1512.

Zhang, L., Shu, X., & Wu, H. (2021). The Effect of R&D Project Diversity on Patenting Activities: Evidence from Chinese Firms. Technovation.

Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Zhu, G., Yam, R. C. M., & Guan, J. (2016). Inter-organizational scientific collaborations and policy effects: An ego-network evolutionary perspective of the Chinese academy of sciences. Scient

ometrics, 108(3), 1–33.